Teams

LT BLUE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-06vs MLF YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanet Krech / Bernita Sterling vs Diane Erickson / Ashley Sloan1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Sale / Mary Rogers vs Cindy Short / Bettina Cosima Larrarte2-6, 4-6
2023-08-30vs ETA REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesBernita Sterling / Shirley Moore vs Carolyn Gattis / Gail Sullivan6-1, 6-3
2023-08-23vs FCCC PINKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanice Sale / Shirley Moore vs Michelle Kennedy / Shanti Green6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJanet Krech vs Angie Decklever6-7, 3-6
2023-08-16vs HMTC TEALSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanet Krech / Leslie Walker vs Lori Masi / Crystal Stowe7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCristine Carpenter / Bernita Sterling vs Jennifer Grim / Kimberley Hattem4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-09vs CSU GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanice Sale / Shirley Moore vs Kathy Carlson / Anne Stavros4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Rogers / Janet Krech vs Jamie Heckman / Shannon Bigner3-6, 5-7
2023-08-02vs TAG ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesBernita Sterling / Shirley Moore vs Stacie Emarine / Amber Nichols6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCristine Carpenter / Janice Sale vs Lori Mooney-Malone / Beth Smits4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Janice Sale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Shirley Moore
published
2.76
Janet Krech
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
2.59
Bernita Sterling
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Rebekah Flannery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Sale + Janet Krech91149% games−3.1% vs expected
Janice Sale + Bernita Sterling101450% games−5.0% vs expected
Janice Sale + Cristine Carpenter404 matchesnot enough data
Janet Krech + Bernita Sterling044 matchesnot enough data
Janice Sale + Shirley Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Janice Sale
95W–103L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
Shirley Moore
34W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Janet Krech
43W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Cristine Carpenter
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Bernita Sterling
71W–106L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
2.59
Rebekah Flannery
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.