Teams

TAG ORANGE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-30vs FCCC PINKLost 01
L#1 DoublesThora Pabst / Stacie Emarine vs Marla Terwilliger / Tara Delaney2-6, 3-6
2023-08-25vs MLF YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesPat Sprock / Thora Pabst vs Maisie Knowles / Ashley Sloan0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Dalton / Lori Mooney-Malone vs Diane Erickson / Geneva Ritsch1-6, 2-6
2023-08-16vs CSU GREENLost 02
L#1 SinglesBeth Smits vs Tiffany Burns4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesThora Pabst / Amber Nichols vs Holly Rodriguez / Shannon Bigner3-6, 1-6
2023-08-09vs ETA REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesBeth Smits vs Shelly Donahue6-2, 6-0
2023-08-02vs LT BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesStacie Emarine / Amber Nichols vs Bernita Sterling / Shirley Moore2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLori Mooney-Malone / Beth Smits vs Cristine Carpenter / Janice Sale6-4, 7-6
2023-07-26vs HMTC TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesPat Sprock / Lori Mooney-Malone vs Lori Masi / Susan Seiler7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Lori Mooney-Malone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Beth Smits
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Sandy Chenore
published
2.46
Thora Pabst
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Amber Nichols
published 2.5
2.42
Stacie Emarine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Deirdre White
published 2.5
Jennifer Borg
published
Melissa Dalton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacie Emarine + Thora Pabst1934% games−10.7% vs expected
Thora Pabst + Lori Mooney-Malone1538% gamesnot enough data
Beth Smits + Lori Mooney-Malone314 matchesnot enough data
Stacie Emarine + Lori Mooney-Malone213 matchesnot enough data
Thora Pabst + Beth Smits123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lori Mooney-Malone
18W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Beth Smits
32W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
2.66
Sandy Chenore
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.54
3
Thora Pabst
30W–85L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.46
2.5
Amber Nichols
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%61%39%
2.46
3
Stacie Emarine
12W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.42
2.5
Deirdre White
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Borg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Dalton
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.