Teams

Fleig

2025 Neb. Adult 18&Over · 3.0 Men- NonAdvancing

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-06vs Lefler 2Split 11
L#1 DoublesWill Fleig / Adam Gleeson vs Jeff Shield / Brent Korte2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMartin Centurion vs David Clark6-0, 6-1
2025-09-14vs EkLost 12
L#1 DoublesMartin Centurion / Viktor Khanzhyn vs Alan Givens / Gonzalo Eizmendi6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesWill Fleig vs John Klotz6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBarrett Shea / Cody Pfeiffer vs Rich Butalla / Dan Inman2-6, 2-6
2025-08-24vs Lefler 1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMartin Centurion / Adam Gleeson vs Jeff VanRoy / Daniel Brailita4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesViktor Khanzhyn / Barrett Shea vs Jeff Abele / Thomas Brady5-7, 5-7
2025-08-10vs EkLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarrett Shea / Tanner Skelton vs John Klotz / Daniel Weyer2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesWill Fleig vs Gonzalo Eizmendi6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Gleeson / Viktor Khanzhyn vs Van Nguyen / Ryan Niemeyer3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-03vs Lefler 1Split 11
L#1 DoublesBarrett Shea / Tanner Skelton vs Charles Deming / Jeff VanRoy2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCody Pfeiffer / Will Fleig vs Thomas Brady / Nolan Spisak7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-27vs Lefler 2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBarrett Shea / Tanner Skelton vs David Clark / Rick Perkins6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesWill Fleig vs Bruno Garcia2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCody Pfeiffer / Adam Gleeson vs Matt Bergmeyer / Jon Day2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Men- NonAdvancing
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lefler 26013511106
2Lefler 1329613113
3Fleig0661226179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Martin Centurion
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.01
Will Fleig
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Adam Gleeson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Barrett Shea
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Cody Pfeiffer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Tanner Skelton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Viktor Khanzhyn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barrett Shea + Tanner Skelton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martin Centurion
7W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Will Fleig
8W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Adam Gleeson
2W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Barrett Shea
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cody Pfeiffer
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tanner Skelton
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Viktor Khanzhyn
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.