Teams

Lefler 1

2025 Neb. Adult 18&Over · 3.0 Men- NonAdvancing

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-15vs Lefler 2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCharles Deming / Thomas Brady vs Kristopher Williams / Rick Perkins6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJeff Abele vs Jon Day5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMark Rose / Jaden Martinez vs Jeff Shield / Matt Bergmeyer2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-24vs FleigWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff VanRoy / Daniel Brailita vs Martin Centurion / Adam Gleeson6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJeff Abele / Thomas Brady vs Viktor Khanzhyn / Barrett Shea7-5, 7-5
2025-08-10vs Lefler 2Split 11
W#1 DoublesDaniel Brailita / Thomas Brady vs Matt Bergmeyer / Rick Perkins6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMark Rose / Charles Deming vs Jeff Shield / Kristopher Williams0-6, 1-6
2025-08-03vs FleigSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCharles Deming / Jeff VanRoy vs Barrett Shea / Tanner Skelton6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Brady / Nolan Spisak vs Cody Pfeiffer / Will Fleig5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-07-27vs EkWon 30
W#1 DoublesThomas Brady / Jaden Martinez vs Alan Givens / Dan Inman6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJeff Abele vs John Klotz6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCharles Deming / Daniel Brailita vs Daniel Weyer / Ryan Niemeyer6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Men- NonAdvancing
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lefler 26013511106
2Lefler 1329613113
3Fleig0661226179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Jeff VanRoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Thomas Brady
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.07
Jeff Abele
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
John Jr Lefler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.85
Nolan Spisak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Daniel Brailita
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Charles Deming
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jaden Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff VanRoy
33W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Thomas Brady
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Jeff Abele
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
John Jr Lefler
46W–142L career · 6 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
Nolan Spisak
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.85
3
Daniel Brailita
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Charles Deming
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Jaden Martinez
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.