Teams

LTC:NY Empires:Heekin

2023 WMA Adult 55 & Over Women · 9.0 Women 1

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-23vs LTC:Immler/BoyleWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Arilee Bagley vs Elizabeth Linder / Meg Donahue4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElaine Heekin / Linda Shafiroff vs Michelle Immler / Debbie Boyle6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJudith Carnavos / Debra Murray vs Ann Henderson / Deborah Panzica5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-23vs LTC:Immler/BoyleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesArilee Bagley / Beverly Swimm vs Meg Donahue / Elizabeth Linder0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Shafiroff / Theresa Cary vs Ann Henderson / Deborah Panzica6-4, 6-2
2023-05-21vs LTC:Immler/BoyleWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngela Miczek / Judith Carnavos vs Susan Madrigan / Deborah Panzica6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElaine Heekin / Linda Shafiroff vs Kate Fleming / Debbie Boyle4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeverly Swimm - * / Theresa Cary vs Ann Henderson / Michelle Immler2-6, 4-6
2023-05-21vs LTC:Immler/BoyleWon 21
W#1 DoublesElaine Heekin / Linda Shafiroff vs Michelle Immler / Ann Henderson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKate Fleming / Debbie Boyle vs Angela Miczek / Beverly Swimm - *0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTheresa Cary / Debra Murray vs Susan Madrigan / Deborah Panzica6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTC:NY Empires:Heekin317512102
2LTC:Immler/Boyle13571494

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Elaine Heekin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Beverly Swimm
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Arilee Bagley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Angela Miczek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Debra Murray
published 4
3.58
Theresa Cary
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Judith Carnavos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Linda Shafiroff
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Heekin + Arilee Bagley6168% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Heekin + Linda Shafiroff4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elaine Heekin
62W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Beverly Swimm
122W–101L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Arilee Bagley
68W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Angela Miczek
108W–104L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Debra Murray
57W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Theresa Cary
67W–78L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
Judith Carnavos
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Shafiroff
38W–15L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.