Teams

Genesis Saw Mill Alley Cats

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.5 Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesSara Hooper / Kelley Sanders vs Marla Heimowitz / Malka Shenker6-7, 4-5
W#2 DoublesKirstin Cole / Monette Wilder vs Annette James / Patches Magarro4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-19vs Club Fit Briarcliff: Wrecking BallsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Goldfischer / Kelley Sanders vs Danielle Powers / Lisa Murakami6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSara Hooper / Monette Wilder vs Jennifer Sheehy / Liz SusmanKarp4-6, 5-7
2025-11-13vs Life Time DiamondWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelley Sanders / Melissa Goldfischer vs Simone Ririmasse / Jennifer Hoffmann3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLiye Zhang / Sara Hooper vs Jane Kim / Patty Martin4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLeah Zygler / Kathleen Gilston vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-06vs Armonk Tennis Club Smart AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelley Sanders / Melissa Goldfischer vs Cathy Hammes / Zoe Robertson7-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Gilston / Monette Wilder vs Fran Torres / Bonnie Berg3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKirstin Cole / Meredith Outwater vs Bridget Banta / Addie Havemeyer6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-30vs Westchester CCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelley Sanders / Sara Hooper vs Caitlin Moffett / Jennifer Particelli3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Gilston / Melissa Goldfischer vs Charlotte Denoyer / Amy Heller6-7, 4-3
2025-10-21vs Rye Racquet Club: RacquettesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelley Sanders / Melissa Goldfischer vs Janice Cavatoni / Michelle Jung3-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSara Hooper / Kirstin Cole vs Kristen Hoft / Rebecca Dickson6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2025-10-15vs Old OaksLost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Hooper / Kelley Sanders vs Nancy Blaine / Remy Mendez6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Gilston / Monette Wilder vs Lauren Levine / Dina Cohen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMeredith Outwater / Leah Zygler vs Marina Hanisch / Heather Conneely3-6, 1-6
2025-09-19vs WTC: 3.5 HighballersWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelley Sanders / Julia Mitchell vs Mallory Hutchinson / Ophira Cukierman6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBlake Eger / Marlo Brevetti vs Cecelia Rees / Nicole Colwell2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSara Hooper / Melissa Goldfischer vs Jennifer Mellet / Christina Tan2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-11vs Rye Racquet: Glam SlammersWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelley Sanders / Julia Mitchell vs Laura Iverson / Patty Mosher6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMelissa Goldfischer / Liye Zhang vs Kirstie Joseph / Heather Cady6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathleen Gilston / Kirstin Cole vs Kendall Truman / Jill DiMassimo3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Blake Eger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Liye Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Kelley Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Melissa Goldfischer
usually #1 Doubles 79%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.94
Sara Hooper
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.93
Leah Zygler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Blakeley Lowry
published 3
2.88
Meredith Outwater
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Monette Wilder
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
2.85
Kathleen Gilston
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Kirstin Cole
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Julia Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marlo Brevetti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Goldfischer + Kelley Sanders5053% games+7.8% vs expected
Melissa Goldfischer + Kathleen Gilston3444% games+3.6% vs expected
Kathleen Gilston + Kirstin Cole61245% games+1.9% vs expected
Kathleen Gilston + Kelley Sanders2542% games−0.9% vs expected
Sara Hooper + Kelley Sanders194142% games−1.3% vs expected
Kathleen Gilston + Marlo Brevetti1834% games−9.6% vs expected
Blake Eger + Marlo Brevetti134 matchesnot enough data
Leah Zygler + Kirstin Cole224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Blake Eger
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Liye Zhang
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Kelley Sanders
48W–66L career · 9 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Melissa Goldfischer
38W–15L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
Sara Hooper
73W–116L career · 7 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
Leah Zygler
40W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Blakeley Lowry
17W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Meredith Outwater
34W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Monette Wilder
66W–54L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
Kathleen Gilston
84W–145L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Kirstin Cole
143W–136L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Julia Mitchell
38W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marlo Brevetti
32W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.