Teams

Life Time Diamond

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.5 Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-11vs Westchester CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Lovejoy / Patty Martin vs Caitlin Moffett / Jennifer Particelli6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarin Pai / Jane Kim vs Elysia Borrelli / Lauren Harding2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hoffmann / Simone Ririmasse vs Danielle Martell / Maureen O'Connor6-3, 6-1
2025-12-03vs Old OaksLost 01
L#3 DoublesJane Kim / Shihwei Jen vs Dina Cohen / Pamela Strauss Peligri2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-11-21vs WTC: 3.5 HighballersWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatty Martin / Nefertiti Greene vs Susan Paxton / Joanna Robin0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJane Kim / Simone Ririmasse vs Megan Kerr / Katie Walbridge6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hoffmann / Beth Nechamkin vs Yang Chen / Wei Denaro6-2, 6-2
2025-11-13vs Genesis Saw Mill Alley CatsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSimone Ririmasse / Jennifer Hoffmann vs Kelley Sanders / Melissa Goldfischer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJane Kim / Patty Martin vs Liye Zhang / Sara Hooper6-4, 7-6
2025-11-04vs Rye Racquet: Glam SlammersWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Kim / Simone Ririmasse vs Laura Iverson / Cristina Lievano7-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRossana Daddio-Menna / Jennifer Hoffmann vs Kirstie Joseph / Tracy Davies5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Nechamkin / Lynn Lewis vs Heather Cady / Jesslyn Moser7-6, 3-3
L#1 DoublesPatty Martin / Carin Pai vs Lisa Olney / Claire Gallagher7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJane Kim / Simone Ririmasse vs Jennifer Sheehy / Liz SusmanKarp4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hoffmann / Beth Nechamkin vs Cindy Greenstein / Joan Behren6-3, 7-6
2025-10-21vs Armonk Tennis Club Smart AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesJane Kim / Jane Doherty vs Lyndie Fasold / Laura Milano6-7, 7-6
W#3 DoublesClemencia Medina / Beth Nechamkin vs Kelly Hack / Fran Torres0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-07vs Rye Racquet Club: RacquettesWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatty Martin / Jennifer Hoffmann vs Rebecca Dickson / Hayley Warshaw6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAmanda Lovejoy / Carin Pai vs Sara Schlussel / Yeonsoo Ohm6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJane Kim / Simone Ririmasse vs Debi Grohman / Lysa Scarselli6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatty Martin / Rossana Daddio-Menna vs Aleksandra Szymanski / Beth Riso6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Amanda Lovejoy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Marisa Epstein
published
3.51
Simone Ririmasse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Patty Martin
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.33
Jane Kim
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Lynn Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Beth Nechamkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Carin Pai
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Jennifer Hoffmann
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Nefertiti Greene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Rossana Daddio-Menna
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Sairah Sheikh
published 3.5
3.01
Clemencia Medina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Shihwei Jen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Doherty
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Simone Ririmasse + Lynn Lewis10070% games+18.4% vs expected
Patty Martin + Carin Pai9553% games+5.8% vs expected
Rossana Daddio-Menna + Carin Pai8651% games+0.5% vs expected
Simone Ririmasse + Jennifer Hoffmann3256% games−1.3% vs expected
Shihwei Jen + Patty Martin21743% games−1.7% vs expected
Patty Martin + Jennifer Hoffmann5452% games−3.1% vs expected
Patty Martin + Rossana Daddio-Menna4649% games−3.5% vs expected
Shihwei Jen + Rossana Daddio-Menna4741% games−3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Lovejoy
27W–68L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Marisa Epstein
42W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
Simone Ririmasse
57W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Patty Martin
48W–102L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Jane Kim
15W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Lynn Lewis
42W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Beth Nechamkin
141W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Carin Pai
46W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Jennifer Hoffmann
50W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Nefertiti Greene
30W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Rossana Daddio-Menna
52W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Sairah Sheikh
69W–34L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Clemencia Medina
42W–49L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
Shihwei Jen
44W–126L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Jane Doherty
30W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.