Teams

Team 6 Loosely Strung

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-18vs Team 13Won 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Whitner / Kendra McQuillan vs Janice Zima / Lyn Reid6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSue Nilsson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-17vs Team 12Won 20
W#1 DoublesKendra McQuillan / Ashley Whitner vs Janet Bradley / Celeste Linthicum6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Duda / Sue Nilsson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-09vs Team 10 Mclean RacquetsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Fulham / Elle Sullivant vs Amy Polly / Hema Sanghani6-1, 6-0
2023-07-05vs Team 8 Start With LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura McNicholl / Deborah Williams vs Brooke Daniels / Tara Jefferson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Keller / Sue Nilsson vs Patricia Hayward / Michele Brookhart6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-06-25vs Team 5 RJT W3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Williams / Laura McNicholl vs Brittany Persino / Kim Whittaker6-3, 5-5
2023-06-18vs Team 15Split 11
L#1 SinglesElle Sullivant vs Stephanie Paduano3-6, 5-4
W#2 DoublesKimberly Fulham / Laura McNicholl vs Allison Hamilton / Kristy Creagh6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Kendra McQuillan
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.86
Ashley Whitner
published 3
2.82
Deborah Williams
published 3
2.80
Sue Nilsson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.73
Elle Sullivant
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Karen Keller
published
2.69
Laura McNicholl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Kimberly Fulham
published
Susan Duda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Fulham + Laura McNicholl213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kendra McQuillan
165W–89L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3
Ashley Whitner
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Deborah Williams
28W–35L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Sue Nilsson
85W–147L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Elle Sullivant
78W–157L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Karen Keller
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Laura McNicholl
92W–115L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Kimberly Fulham
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.48
Kerilyn McMichael-Beltran
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Duda
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.