Teams

Team 10 Mclean Racquets

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-07vs Team 4 Get A GripLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie Bielski / Tracey Walthall vs Stephanie Fultz / Shelly Briscoe2-6, 1-6
2023-06-29vs Team 1 Tamara's Slice GirlsLost 02
L#1 SinglesTracey Walthall vs Barbara Hancock0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJodi Seth / Lisa Singleton vs Holly Ford / Johanna Maney1-6, 2-6
2023-06-23vs Team 11 Sassy SmashersWon 10
W#2 DoublesNoelle Dubiansky / Tracey Walthall vs April Rabayda / Elisa Wolf5-7, 4-1
2023-06-19vs Team 14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Magner / Jodi Seth vs Elisabeth Pearson - (DQ)* / Alison Weiss0-6, 1-6
2023-06-15vs Team 9Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Magner / Priya Aurora vs Kelly Overman / Seema Dabas2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Sara Magner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Tracey Walthall
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.74
Melanie Bielski
published 3
2.70
Anita Wasan
published 3
2.62
Katherine Mathis
published
2.46
Jodi Seth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.18
Hema Sanghani
published 2.5
Layla Lauchman
published
Sarah Wiederkehr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Wasan + Tracey Walthall4743% games−3.1% vs expected
Anita Wasan + Jodi Seth1633% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Seth + Tracey Walthall134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sara Magner
75W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
3
Tracey Walthall
19W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Melanie Bielski
15W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Anita Wasan
42W–69L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Katherine Mathis
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
2.62
3
Jodi Seth
41W–85L career · 2 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Hema Sanghani
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
Layla Lauchman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Wiederkehr
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.