Teams

Team 9

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-13vs Team 16 Team Great FallsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Overman / Cristin Finkel vs Abby Colucci / Kerry Purdy0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs Karyn DeVito1-6, 3-6
2023-07-06Split 11
L#1 DoublesAmelia Gay / Joanne Swain vs Sally Keith / Sheryl Morley4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-25vs Team 12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs Eleanor McManus0-6, 1-6
2023-06-22vs Team 15Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoanne Swain / Kelly Overman vs Doris Sandall / Ann Bauer6-0, 6-2
2023-06-15vs Team 10 Mclean RacquetsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Overman / Seema Dabas vs Sara Magner / Priya Aurora6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKerri Thomas vs Sarah Wiederkehr3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Kerri Thomas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Amelia Gay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Kelly Overman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Stacey Bowlin
published
2.89
Mandy Doerr
published
2.87
Joanne Swain
published
2.86
Greta Kohlhagen
published
2.83
Maureen Petron
published
Cristin Finkel
published 3
2.66
Erin Parker
published
2.64
Taryn Walpole
published
2.58
Seema Dabas
published
2.56
Sarah Trimmer
published
2.39
Darlene Bakke
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Parker + Maureen Petron213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kerri Thomas
98W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Amelia Gay
49W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3
Kelly Overman
44W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
Stacey Bowlin
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Mandy Doerr
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Joanne Swain
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.87
Greta Kohlhagen
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
2.86
Maureen Petron
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Cristin Finkel
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Erin Parker
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
Taryn Walpole
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
Seema Dabas
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58
Sarah Trimmer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Darlene Bakke
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.