Teams

Team 11 Sassy Smashers

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesJill Gyllensvaan / Cory Kleinmann vs Boriana Chopova / Leylan Savasman7-5, 3-3
2023-07-12vs Team 8 Start With LoveLost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Gyllensvaan / Melissa Huang vs Brooke Daniels / Tara Jefferson5-7, 1-5
L#1 SinglesElisa Wolf vs Claudia Guardia4-6, 2-1
L#2 DoublesLeticia Baldwin / Aida Blumen vs Donna Jones / Casey Royster3-6, 2-6
2023-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Davis / Yolanda Tsai vs Robin Powers / Nancy Lopez6-2, 5-2
2023-06-25vs Team 15Won 10
W#1 SinglesElisa Wolf vs Stephanie Paduano6-2, 6-1
2023-06-23vs Team 10 Mclean RacquetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesApril Rabayda / Elisa Wolf vs Noelle Dubiansky / Tracey Walthall7-5, 1-4
2023-06-17vs Team 8 Start With LoveWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeticia Baldwin / Melissa Huang vs Michele Brookhart / Rise Lancoon6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Josephine Cooper
published
3.33
Elisa Wolf
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Jill Gyllensvaan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.96
Yolanda Tsai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
April Rabayda
published 3
2.70
Kim McCool
published
2.59
Ashley Littman
published 3
Leticia Baldwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Huang
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josephine Cooper
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Elisa Wolf
177W–86L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Jill Gyllensvaan
82W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Yolanda Tsai
76W–59L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
April Rabayda
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
Kim McCool
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Ashley Littman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
2.59
Leticia Baldwin
5W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Huang
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.