Teams

CK RED

2023 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-20vs LEBTC BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Bebber / John Jansons vs Emily Dreyer / Jamie Dreyer6-3, 6-4
2023-05-07vs NJ GREENSplit 11
W#2 DoublesThomas Pott / Karen Bebber vs Joseph Rodriguez / Holly Bristol6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Jansons / Lynne Jansons vs Craig Krastins / STACEY OELTJENBRUNS3-6, 3-6
2023-04-30vs KC-CC BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Bebber / John Jansons vs Ken Eiken / Char Eiken1-6, 1-6
2023-04-30vs KC-CC ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Jansons / Lynne Jansons vs Sarah Bryan / Doug Bryan3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGary Bebber / Karen Bebber vs Kathleen Rose / Jason Rose3-1
2023-04-23vs MC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Jansons / Lynne Jansons vs Michelle Kondrat / Michael Catalano1-6, 0-6
2023-04-16vs NJ ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Jansons / Lynne Jansons vs Yah Pisutpongpan / Danielle Feely1-6, 0-6
2023-04-02vs PH BLUELost 02
L#2 DoublesLynne Jansons / John Jansons vs Stan Mohler / Katie Mohler0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGary Bebber / Karen Bebber vs Alan Kuettel / Kristin McDonald7-6, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Ken Reed
published
3.37
Thomas Pott
published
2.91
Karen Bebber
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Lynne Jansons
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
John Jansons
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.66
Alisa Pott
published 3
2.61
Sandy Reed
published
Gary Bebber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Reed + Sandy Reed51041% games−3.8% vs expected
Alisa Pott + Thomas Pott1931% games−14.7% vs expected
Karen Bebber + Gary Bebber1738% gamesnot enough data
John Jansons + Lynne Jansons0517% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Reed
21W–36L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Thomas Pott
3W–27L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.37
3
Karen Bebber
44W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Lynne Jansons
33W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
3
John Jansons
37W–64L career · 7 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Alisa Pott
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Sandy Reed
17W–24L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
Gary Bebber
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.