Teams

Mandigo

2025 Neb. Adult 18&Over Tri-Level · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-17vs LI/Tegler/Mid-TriWWon 21
W#1 DoublesHerita Akamah / Jaydn Dorr vs Stacia Thiesen / Jennifer Stai6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJane Strawhecker / Shalla Powell Mandigo vs Terri Dunlap / Nancy Johnson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGwen Bown / Yuka Goosic vs Nelle Jamison / Nicole Figard4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-10vs LI/Wain/Mid-TriWLost 12
L#1 DoublesHerita Akamah / Sophie Miller vs Katherine Ternent / Natalie Hicks5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHelen Jamison / Alexandra Lubben vs Stacy Pickering / Lisa Wilkinson6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCatherine Porath / Gwen Bown vs Deb Boehle / Tram Rademacher3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-03vs GarciaWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Garcia / Herita Akamah vs Emma Bergmeyer / Tami Bourland6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesShalla Powell Mandigo / Alexandra Lubben vs Lesly Garcia / Heidi Weber3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesYuka Goosic / Gwen Bown vs Yulia Levchenko / Yelizaveta Beltz6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-08-27vs LI/Tegler/Mid-TriWLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Garcia / Sophie Miller vs Andrea Mueller / Jennifer Stai1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShalla Powell Mandigo / Helen Jamison vs Tammy Tegler / Jodi Anderson0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Porath / Yuka Goosic vs Nelle Jamison / Stephanie Hohlen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-08-20vs LI/Wain/Mid-TriWWon 21
W#1 DoublesHerita Akamah / Jaydn Dorr vs MacY McDonald / Natalie Hicks6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJane Strawhecker / Shalla Powell Mandigo vs Stacy Pickering / Jodi Nelson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesYuka Goosic / Gwen Bown vs Caitlin Wain / Tram Rademacher7-6, 6-2
2025-08-13vs GarciaLost 03
L#1 DoublesSophie Miller / Elizabeth Garcia vs Lesly Garcia / Emma Bergmeyer6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Lubben / Catherine Porath vs Maria Garcia / Christa Pope5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesYuka Goosic / Jaci Klein vs Yulia Levchenko / Tawnie Escamilla4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OM/Tong-Vineyard/Mid-TriW6014410132
2NE/Banks-Thielen/Tri-3.5-4.5W511449121
3OM/Blake/Mid-TriW4213515138
4LI/Wain/Mid-TriW4210821162
5LI/Tegler/Mid-TriW3311717148
6Heard/Kingston3381021175
7Mandigo3371124184
8Garcia2481021171
9Jorgensen2461227195
10Gradoville1541431205
11Hazelrigg0641428199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Sophie Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Herita Akamah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Alexandra Lubben
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.42
Elizabeth Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Shalla Powell Mandigo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Jane Strawhecker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Helen Jamison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Jaci Klein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Yuka Goosic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Catherine Porath
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Gwen Bown
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jaydn Dorr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gwen Bown + Yuka Goosic13556% games+10.4% vs expected
Herita Akamah + Jaydn Dorr3260% games+3.0% vs expected
Herita Akamah + Sophie Miller4258% games+1.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Garcia + Sophie Miller2344% games−4.2% vs expected
Shalla Powell Mandigo + Catherine Porath314 matchesnot enough data
Shalla Powell Mandigo + Alexandra Lubben134 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Garcia + Shalla Powell Mandigo303 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Garcia + Herita Akamah213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophie Miller
53W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.80
Herita Akamah
87W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Alexandra Lubben
83W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Elizabeth Garcia
18W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Shalla Powell Mandigo
62W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Jane Strawhecker
66W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Helen Jamison
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.22
Jaci Klein
8W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Yuka Goosic
52W–45L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Catherine Porath
76W–124L career · 3 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Gwen Bown
61W–55L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Jaydn Dorr
28W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.