Teams

LI/Wain/Mid-TriW

2025 Neb. Adult 18&Over Tri-Level · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-17vs GarciaLost 12
W#1 DoublesKatherine Ternent / Jennifer Powell vs Ashley Tyler / Katie Horan6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJodi Nelson / Lisa Wilkinson vs Lesly Garcia / Heidi Weber2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTram Rademacher / Barbara Tegt vs Stephanie Randall / Yelizaveta Beltz0-6, 1-6
2025-09-10vs MandigoWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Ternent / Natalie Hicks vs Herita Akamah / Sophie Miller7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacy Pickering / Lisa Wilkinson vs Helen Jamison / Alexandra Lubben3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDeb Boehle / Tram Rademacher vs Catherine Porath / Gwen Bown6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-03vs LI/Tegler/Mid-TriWWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalie Hicks / Katherine Ternent vs Jennifer Stai / Andrea Mueller6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacy Pickering / Jennifer Powell vs Terri Dunlap / Nicole Carmine6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDeb Boehle / Tram Rademacher vs Stephanie Hohlen / MELISSA HERSHBERGER2-6, 0-6
2025-08-27vs GarciaWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Ternent / MacY McDonald vs Polly ReQua / Emma Bergmeyer6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStacy Pickering / Jennifer Powell vs Lesly Garcia / Christa Pope6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCaitlin Wain / Deb Boehle vs Maria Garcia / Tawnie Escamilla5-7, 3-6
2025-08-20vs MandigoLost 12
L#1 DoublesMacY McDonald / Natalie Hicks vs Herita Akamah / Jaydn Dorr4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Pickering / Jodi Nelson vs Jane Strawhecker / Shalla Powell Mandigo6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCaitlin Wain / Tram Rademacher vs Yuka Goosic / Gwen Bown6-7, 2-6
2025-08-13vs LI/Tegler/Mid-TriWWon 21
W#1 DoublesMacY McDonald / Natalie Hicks vs Stacia Thiesen / Andrea Mueller6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJodi Nelson / Lisa Wilkinson vs Nancy Johnson / Terri Dunlap6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBarbara Tegt / Caitlin Wain vs Nicole Figard / MELISSA HERSHBERGER6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OM/Tong-Vineyard/Mid-TriW6014410132
2NE/Banks-Thielen/Tri-3.5-4.5W511449121
3OM/Blake/Mid-TriW4213515138
4LI/Wain/Mid-TriW4210821162
5LI/Tegler/Mid-TriW3311717148
6Heard/Kingston3381021175
7Mandigo3371124184
8Garcia2481021171
9Jorgensen2461227195
10Gradoville1541431205
11Hazelrigg0641428199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Katherine Ternent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
MacY McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Jodi Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Stacy Pickering
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Natalie Hicks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Barbara Tegt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Caitlin Wain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Tram Rademacher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Lisa Wilkinson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Deb Boehle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jennifer Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Powell + Natalie Hicks4250% games+10.8% vs expected
Natalie Hicks + Katherine Ternent3644% games+4.6% vs expected
Jodi Nelson + Lisa Wilkinson81147% games−1.1% vs expected
Caitlin Wain + Tram Rademacher5454% games−1.4% vs expected
Barbara Tegt + Tram Rademacher4253% games−14.1% vs expected
Jennifer Powell + Lisa Wilkinson3646% gamesnot enough data
Deb Boehle + Caitlin Wain044 matchesnot enough data
Deb Boehle + Tram Rademacher134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Ternent
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
MacY McDonald
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Jodi Nelson
119W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Stacy Pickering
105W–55L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Natalie Hicks
15W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Tegt
20W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Caitlin Wain
34W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Tram Rademacher
43W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Lisa Wilkinson
70W–127L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
3.5
Deb Boehle
54W–103L career · 3 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
Jennifer Powell
25W–29L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.