Teams

Farmer/Nadel 40s 3.0

2022 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-19vs Walters/Wurth 40s 3.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMyra Propst / Ann Fair vs Angie Messick / Mariann Van Ryen2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRose Chrismon / Bobbi McEntee vs Janice Wilkinson / Susan Rogers1-6, 2-6
2022-05-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesBobbi McEntee / Rose Chrismon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-02vs Williams/Murray 40s 3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesBobbi McEntee / Janet Gorham vs DONNA BRIDGEFORD / Deborah Ysidron6-1, 6-3
2022-04-18vs Hanson 40s 3.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesLydia Nadel / Myra Propst vs Amy Hanson / Melanie Miller6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMaria Linden / Bobbi McEntee vs Donna Keel / Kristen Davis6-3, 6-3
2022-04-11vs Walters/Wurth 40s 3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Shoemaker / Myra Propst vs Lee Farley / Melissa Gujrati6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-03-28vs Williams/Murray 40s 3.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMyra Propst / Janet Gorham vs Leslie Murray / Tiana Pitts2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Maria Linden
published
2.97
Michelle Shoemaker
published
2.85
Sue White
published
2.85
Ila Rosenthal
published 3
2.74
Cindy Wood
published 3
2.69
Eleanor Redding
published 3
2.65
Myra Propst
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.64
Lydia Nadel
published
2.50
Ann Fair
published 3
2.47
Rose Chrismon
published
2.43
Bobbi McEntee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Janet Gorham
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Linden
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
Michelle Shoemaker
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
Sue White
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Ila Rosenthal
11W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Cindy Wood
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Eleanor Redding
5W–22L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Myra Propst
147W–178L career · 8 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Lydia Nadel
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Ann Fair
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
Bobbi McEntee
87W–103L career · 4 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.43
Janet Gorham
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.