Teams

TOC.Ramaswamy

2025 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-26vs TOC.KalluruSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Claude Ruffieux6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesDEEPAK GAONKAR vs Seshagiri Kalluru3-6, 2-6
2025-08-23vs TOC.JayashankaranLost 02
L#2 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Sean Heuser2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Rahul Narang3-6, 1-6
2025-08-17vs TOC.KalluruLost 01
L#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Brian Dorais6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-28vs TOC.JayashankaranSplit 11
W#2 SinglesGhanshyamsinh Gohil vs Sean Heuser4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Sri Vellanki1-6, 5-7
2025-07-17vs TOC.KalluruWon 10
W#3 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Seshagiri Kalluru7-5, 6-3
2025-07-16vs TOC.JayashankaranLost 01
L#1 SinglesDEEPAK GAONKAR vs Santha Perian3-6, 3-6
2025-06-25vs TOC.KalluruWon 21
W#1 SinglesGhanshyamsinh Gohil vs Claude Ruffieux6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Brian Dorais6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Seshagiri Kalluru6-1, 6-4
2025-06-02vs TOC.JayashankaranLost 02
L#2 SinglesGhanshyamsinh Gohil vs Praveen Krishnamurthy7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Santha Perian3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Ghanshyamsinh Gohil
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.88
Diego Angelo
published 4
3.72
Kiran Ramaswamy
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.44
DEEPAK GAONKAR
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.43
Amit Sachan
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Scott Benson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amit Sachan + Kiran Ramaswamy15854% games+0.4% vs expected
Amit Sachan + DEEPAK GAONKAR9655% gamesnot enough data
Amit Sachan + Ghanshyamsinh Gohil6252% gamesnot enough data
Kiran Ramaswamy + Ghanshyamsinh Gohil6261% gamesnot enough data
DEEPAK GAONKAR + Kiran Ramaswamy2355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ghanshyamsinh Gohil
200W–81L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
4.11
4
Diego Angelo
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Kiran Ramaswamy
178W–127L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
DEEPAK GAONKAR
49W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Amit Sachan
255W–240L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Scott Benson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.