Teams

MEMPK HENRY

2023 ITA MIXED - SOCO · MIXED 8.5 - ITA - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-25vs CSRC RAMIREZLost 01
L#3 DoublesPat Pottger / Ankie Richard vs Patrick Ramirez / Nancy Siegel3-6, 4-6
2023-08-22vs CSRC RAMIREZWon 10
W#2 DoublesHunter Renn / Carolayne Henry vs Matthew Kiser / Stephanie King4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-08-20vs CSRC DANIELSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Hunter Renn vs Jessica Hilton / Mark Hutter6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPat Pottger / Ankie Richard vs Jon New / Jennifer Mutka4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-08-06vs CSRC RAMIREZSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPat Pottger / Ankie Richard vs Patrick Ramirez / Melissa Doidge6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHunter Renn / Carolayne Henry vs Frank Coyle / Nancy Barker2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-07-09vs CSRC DANIELLost 02
L#1 DoublesPat Pottger / Ankie Richard vs Sean Daniel / Stefanie McCarron6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHunter Renn / Carolayne Henry vs Jon New / Jennifer Mutka2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Ankie Richard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.23
Pat Pottger
published 4.5
4.22
Jared May
published
4.21
Hunter Renn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.12
Rebecca Martin
published
3.72
Carolayne Henry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Megan May
published
Jon Bayne
published
Joshua Voss
published
Shinobu Voss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan May + Jared May3450% games+2.7% vs expected
Carolayne Henry + Pat Pottger3648% games−9.9% vs expected
Hunter Renn + Carolayne Henry4847% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Voss + Shinobu Voss314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ankie Richard
130W–55L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Pat Pottger
56W–60L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Jared May
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Hunter Renn
42W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.21
Rebecca Martin
14W–24L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.12
4
Carolayne Henry
122W–136L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Megan May
14W–16L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Jon Bayne
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joshua Voss
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shinobu Voss
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.