Teams

BC-MCC/MichaelKarr

2025 SO CAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.0

24 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-13vs BC-MiraCosta/AsamSheikhWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Reiner / Ethan Leff vs Jason Scholz / Wes Chien Nguyen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-23vs BC-WestEnd/GaiOdanakaWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Shure / Paul Reiner vs Ali Mashhadi / Tom Hindman6-2, 7-6
2025-11-08vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/JonathanLababitSplit 11
L#1 DoublesErik Johnson / John Shure vs Bruce Hofert / Ethan Waldman4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Reiner / Arsen Harutyunyan vs Eric Geiger / Ralph Nunley7-6, 7-5
2025-10-18vs BC-AltaVista/RobertGillLost 01
L#2 DoublesRick Rumpp / Marc Goedemans vs Ronald Esguerra / Dustin Rhone3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesErik Johnson / Arsen Harutyunyan vs Nigel Beckmeier / Praveenkumar Devarajan5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBill Stirewalt / Cameron Samimi vs Venk Tatineni / Willie Yeh7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBruno Gasparetti / Scott Hoffman vs Rodney Litorja / Richard Ortiz-Reyes5-7, 2-6
2025-09-28vs BC-WestEnd/ToddArnsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesErik Johnson / Matthew Luce vs Ken Senoo / Seitaro Ishida4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Shepley / Tom Sheets vs Kenny Lee / Steve Hulbert6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCarter Skeath / Andrew Mardis vs Todd Arnson / Brian Hall1-6, 1-6
2025-09-13vs BC-PVTC/BarryIrvineLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Shure / Rick Rumpp vs Barry Irvine / Josh Goldstein0-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cameron Samimi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Arsen Harutyunyan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Brian Kelleher
published 4
3.71
Jeff Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Marc Goedemans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Paul Reiner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Dean DeVore
published 4
3.62
William Reiter
published
3.62
Steve Shepley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Ethan Leff
published
3.61
Keith Simpson
published
3.61
Matthew Luce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
John Shure
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Andrew Mardis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Bill Stirewalt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Rick Rumpp
published
3.45
Carter Skeath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Charles Southey
published 3.5
3.31
Richard Hume
published 3.5
3.19
Bruno Gasparetti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Doug Nishida
published
Michael Karr
published
Robert Conte
published
Tom Sheets
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Reiner + John Shure4846% gamesnot enough data
Paul Reiner + Dean DeVore0643% gamesnot enough data
Richard Hume + Rick Rumpp033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cameron Samimi
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Arsen Harutyunyan
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Brian Kelleher
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Jeff Stephens
19W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Marc Goedemans
29W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Paul Reiner
93W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Dean DeVore
0W–10L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
William Reiter
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Steve Shepley
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Ethan Leff
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
Keith Simpson
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Matthew Luce
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
John Shure
101W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
4
Andrew Mardis
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Bill Stirewalt
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Rick Rumpp
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Carter Skeath
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Charles Southey
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Richard Hume
8W–23L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Bruno Gasparetti
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Doug Nishida
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Karr
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Conte
22W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Sheets
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.