Teams

Sh.Roberts18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-29vs Ma.Roschel18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesNate Wireback vs Marcelo Roschel6-4, 6-3
2025-07-22vs Ad.Whitesell18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesNate Wireback vs David Gorman6-1, 6-1
2025-07-15vs Mi.Ratliff18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesNate Wireback vs Michael Ratliff4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 SinglesTaylor Atherton vs Richard Johnson6-0, 6-2
2025-07-08vs An.Womack18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesTaylor Atherton vs Kevin Manweiler7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSheldon Roberts vs Anthony Womack6-1, 6-2
2025-07-01vs De.Farmer18S3.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesSheldon Roberts vs Clay Fussell6-0, 6-3
2025-06-24vs Je.Pollack18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesNate Wireback vs Andrew Chan6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTaylor Atherton vs Nathan Pool6-2, 6-0
2025-06-10vs Jo.Hasting18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesSheldon Roberts vs Travis Salts7-6, 6-1
2025-06-03vs Da.Kelly18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesTaylor Atherton vs Jonathan Drum6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSheldon Roberts vs Scott Hoffman6-3, 6-2
2025-05-27vs Le.Reece18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesNate Wireback vs Jack Drechsler6-3, 6-4
2025-05-20vs Br.Ross18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesTaylor Atherton vs Kyle Faltisco7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNate Wireback vs James Wu6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSheldon Roberts vs Rex Bickley6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Nate Wireback
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.69
Will Howell
published
3.64
Sheldon Roberts
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.61
Taylor Atherton
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.54
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Atherton + Sheldon Roberts7264% games+9.1% vs expected
Taylor Atherton + Nate Wireback6260% games+6.9% vs expected
Nate Wireback + Will Howell224 matchesnot enough data
Nate Wireback + Sheldon Roberts314 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Atherton + Will Howell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nate Wireback
95W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.70
Will Howell
20W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.69
3.5
Sheldon Roberts
63W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.64
3.5
Taylor Atherton
77W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Joseph Hollingsworth
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.