Teams

Nelligan / Vacco

2022 18&Over Mixed · 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.56 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-30vs GreethamWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie Thompson / Danilo Fernando vs Elisabeth Moughty / Nikhil Joshi6-1, 7-5
2022-04-23vs SFTC - WallensteinLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Kaye / Richard Hall vs Stephen Nesspor / Audrey Sauer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-02vs Western: 40-LoveSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephanie Thompson / Richard Hall vs Donna Hack / Jason Lam2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBrianna Laureti / Danilo Fernando vs Alex Vizgaitis / Ben Jung2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-19vs SFTC - WallensteinWon 20
W#1 DoublesNorifumi Urao / Dawn McLaughlin vs Stephen Nesspor / Lisa Campagna6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesOle Westergaard / Mary Kaye vs Zunli Lu / Kate Grimm6-4, 6-3
2022-03-05vs GreethamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrianna Laureti / Danilo Fernando vs Anne Brandt / Steve Brandt5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Leuenberger / Ole Westergaard vs Molly Ryan / Nikhil Joshi2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-02-26vs Western: 40-LoveLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Thompson / Sean Hynes vs Jeeyoon Kim / Joon Young Kim2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Kaye / Ole Westergaard vs MARCY DEMBS / Wonhee Cho0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDawn McLaughlin / Norifumi Urao vs Alex Vizgaitis / Myong Won Seo7-5, 7-5
2022-02-05vs SFTC - WallensteinWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrianna Laureti / Danilo Fernando vs Juliet Concilla / Robert Auler6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Thompson / Richard Hall vs Mary-Ellen Cereo / Ken Frieden6-3, 4-3
2022-01-29vs GreethamLost 01
L#2 DoublesOle Westergaard / Stephanie Thompson vs Anne Brandt / Kenneth Alweis2-6, 1-6
2022-01-22vs Western: 40-LoveLost 12
L#1 DoublesDawn McLaughlin / Norifumi Urao vs Jason Lam / MARCY DEMBS4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Leuenberger / Christopher Fletcher vs Ryu Kim / Eunhee Park7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Kaye / Ole Westergaard vs Wonhee Cho / Jeeyoon Kim3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: 40-Love8121616189
2Nelligan / Vacco63171025232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Brianna Laureti
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Ann Leuenberger
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.63
Richard Ingraham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.63
Norifumi Urao
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.36
Mary Kaye
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.34
Stephanie Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Lisa Nelligan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christopher Fletcher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Danilo Fernando
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.10
Jacki Goldberg
published 3.5
Dawn McLaughlin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ole Westergaard
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Richard Hall
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Nelligan + Richard Ingraham16269% games+13.5% vs expected
Mary Kaye + Norifumi Urao11166% games+10.5% vs expected
Lisa Nelligan + Norifumi Urao4162% games+9.0% vs expected
Ann Leuenberger + Norifumi Urao6456% games+8.5% vs expected
Danilo Fernando + Lisa Nelligan10954% games−7.2% vs expected
Dawn McLaughlin + Norifumi Urao18559% games−7.5% vs expected
Danilo Fernando + Brianna Laureti7451% games−7.9% vs expected
Mary Kaye + Ole Westergaard4449% games−15.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brianna Laureti
93W–27L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Ann Leuenberger
173W–92L career · 13 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Richard Ingraham
134W–41L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Norifumi Urao
114W–34L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Mary Kaye
165W–108L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Stephanie Thompson
42W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Lisa Nelligan
94W–57L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Christopher Fletcher
32W–15L career · type M · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3
Danilo Fernando
50W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.12
3.5
Jacki Goldberg
29W–21L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Dawn McLaughlin
21W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ole Westergaard
41W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Hall
49W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.