Teams

BCST PURPLE

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.81 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-12vs LEBTC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanis Owens / Kathy Owens vs Melinda Grandy / Kim Kronenberger Hogan5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Harvey / Maryann Barwick vs Suzette Calvillo / Julie Horsting6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathleen Antony / Leslie Aranjo vs LeAnn Joswick / Ann Adams5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-05vs KC-CC NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Leon / Maryann Barwick vs Annamaria Augustine / Catherine Pinto3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanis Owens / Judith Wallach vs Darlene Gonzales / Carla Minckley4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Ehler / Kathleen Antony vs Judy Greco / Jean Pullen1-6, 3-6
2025-05-29vs BM REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanis Owens / Kathy Owens vs Carol Markley / Miki Lorentz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Ehler / Beth Leon vs Kathleen Turner / Mary Hobson0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJudith Wallach / Maryann Barwick vs Susan Hickel / Susan High4-6, 0-6
2025-05-22vs PH REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanis Owens / Kathy Owens vs Colleen Schwarz / Carolyn Watson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Antony / Mary Mucilli vs Joyce Anderson / Stacie Cowell1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Harvey / Judith Wallach vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-15vs KC-CC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJudith Wallach / Michelle Harvey vs Lori Goulding / Janie Ramseier2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanis Owens / Sharon Ehler vs Stacey Dickman / Elizabeth Crites1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMaryann Barwick / Kathy Owens vs Deven Farris / Sherry Cronin4-6, 3-6
2025-05-08vs CK BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesMaryann Barwick / Mary Mucilli vs Kathryn Dann / Jennifer Harrop6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Harvey / Kathy Owens vs Karen Bebber / Alisa Pott1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Ehler / Kathleen Antony vs Mary Barnett / Linda Head4-6, 2-6
2025-05-01vs HRCA-N BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Leon / Kathy Owens vs Kathy Breth / Becki Jernigan4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanis Owens / Sharon Ehler vs Maria Hush / Carol Avery5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Wallach / Leslie Aranjo vs Carol Manlove / Nancy Sharpe1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CPV NAVY5214716174
2CK BLUE5214718183
3BCST PURPLE2551635229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Mary Mucilli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Kathy Owens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.49
Beth Leon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Maryann Barwick
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.44
Judith Wallach
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.43
Janis Owens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.34
Leslie Aranjo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Sharon Ehler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.24
Kathleen Antony
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Michelle Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Mucilli + Judith Wallach3645% games+0.3% vs expected
Beth Leon + Janis Owens4847% games−3.6% vs expected
Mary Mucilli + Maryann Barwick82842% games−3.6% vs expected
Michelle Harvey + Judith Wallach0735% games−6.6% vs expected
Sharon Ehler + Janis Owens4940% games−12.9% vs expected
Beth Leon + Maryann Barwick31144% games−13.2% vs expected
Beth Leon + Sharon Ehler21138% games−13.7% vs expected
Janis Owens + Judith Wallach5745% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Mucilli
26W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Kathy Owens
11W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Beth Leon
18W–60L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
3
Maryann Barwick
27W–76L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Judith Wallach
34W–72L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
3
Janis Owens
36W–62L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43
2.5
Leslie Aranjo
87W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Sharon Ehler
19W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Kathleen Antony
51W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Michelle Harvey
2W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.