Teams

BM RED

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-12vs KC-CC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesNathalia Faribault / Mary Hobson vs Gina Akins / Stacey Dickman2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Susan High vs Deven Farris / Jennifer Manta2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Gallagher / Susan Hickel vs Sherry Cronin / Marlene Samokishyn6-4, 7-5
2025-06-05vs CK BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesJanet Lane / Deb Lawson vs Mary Barnett / Mary LeSueur4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMary Hobson / Linda Paysinger vs Linda Head / Sandy Reed7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Susan Hickel vs Karen Bebber / Alisa Pott1-6, 0-6
2025-05-29vs BCST PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Markley / Miki Lorentz vs Janis Owens / Kathy Owens2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Turner / Mary Hobson vs Sharon Ehler / Beth Leon6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Hickel / Susan High vs Judith Wallach / Maryann Barwick6-4, 6-0
2025-05-22vs LEBTC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Gallagher / Linda Paysinger vs Melinda Grandy / Megan Fry3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMiki Lorentz / Kathleen Turner vs Jennifer McPherson / Jennifer Renard7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeb Lawson / Janet Lane vs Suzette Calvillo / Julie Horsting6-2, 6-4
2025-05-15vs KC-CC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesNathalia Faribault / Kathleen Turner vs Annamaria Augustine / Ellen Lee4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Hickel / Philippa Biggi vs Lisa Garcia / Christine Jacquet6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJanet Lane / Deb Lawson vs Christie Mann / Jean Pullen1-6, 4-6
2025-05-08vs HRCA-N BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Hobson / Linda Paysinger vs Maria Hush / Becki Jernigan4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Nathalia Faribault vs Carol Avery / Cinda Nab1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Gallagher / Carol Markley vs Nancy Sharpe / Adrienne Cramer6-7, 6-7
2025-05-01vs PH REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesNathalia Faribault / Kathleen Turner vs Colleen Schwarz / Stacie Cowell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Gallagher / Linda Paysinger vs Joyce Anderson / Nancy Waas6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Susan Hickel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Miki Lorentz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Carol Markley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Philippa Biggi
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
Nathalia Faribault
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Mary Hobson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.34
Ann Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Deb Lawson
published
Janet Lane
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen Turner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Linda Paysinger
published
Susan High
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathalia Faribault + Miki Lorentz5348% games−1.5% vs expected
Susan Hickel + Philippa Biggi101050% games−6.7% vs expected
Carol Markley + Janet Lane31338% gamesnot enough data
Carol Markley + Mary Hobson4643% gamesnot enough data
Nathalia Faribault + Mary Hobson5252% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Turner + Nathalia Faribault2349% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Turner + Mary Hobson2345% gamesnot enough data
Carol Markley + Miki Lorentz224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Susan Hickel
30W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Miki Lorentz
84W–98L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Carol Markley
24W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Philippa Biggi
62W–106L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Nathalia Faribault
30W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.62
3
Mary Hobson
34W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Ann Gallagher
18W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.34
Deb Lawson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Lane
9W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Turner
18W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Paysinger
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan High
13W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.