Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Baeza)(FB)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-08-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDenisse Gomez vs Cynthia Canales3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Cartwright)(EPCC)81341127298
2GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Treuba)(EPTC#2)81331230319
3GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Baeza)(FB)63252042356
4GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Gutierrez)(EPTC#1)63291643368
5GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Olmos)(EPTC#5)54202556418
6GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Garcia)(EPTC#4)45202556408
7GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Abbud)(CCC#1)45222357447
8GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Paralles)(TW#1)27192656409
9GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Allen)(TW#2)18153064429
10GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Cardenas)(CCC#2)1883777502

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Helga Sauza
usually #1 Singles 47%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
3.27
Gerla Gallardo
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
Denisse Gomez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Claire Brandon
usually #2 Doubles 59%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
3.20
Erika Centeno
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Guadalupe Castillo
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.12
Alyssa Hinojos
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 3.5
2.80
Ellen Michnovicz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.63
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
Maggie Follin
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 8% · published
Margaret Baeza
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Ramona Beard
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Sarahi Najera
usually #2 Singles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tanja Sobing
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Ursula Morawietz
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gerla Gallardo + Guadalupe Castillo12656% games+0.8% vs expected
Guadalupe Castillo + Ursula Morawietz12957% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Ursula Morawietz7356% gamesnot enough data
Ramona Beard + Guadalupe Castillo5262% gamesnot enough data
Ramona Beard + Margaret Baeza3447% gamesnot enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Margaret Baeza3451% gamesnot enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Alyssa Hinojos4254% gamesnot enough data
Guadalupe Castillo + Sarahi Najera2445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Helga Sauza
76W–39L career · 32 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Gerla Gallardo
96W–61L career · 36 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Denisse Gomez
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Claire Brandon
35W–45L career · 17 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Erika Centeno
36W–25L career · 37 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Guadalupe Castillo
92W–65L career · 19 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Alyssa Hinojos
42W–44L career · 12 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ellen Michnovicz
45W–70L career · 8 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.80
3
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
59W–86L career · 30 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Maggie Follin
42W–32L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Baeza
23W–26L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ramona Beard
54W–59L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarahi Najera
69W–38L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tanja Sobing
27W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ursula Morawietz
39W–28L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.