Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Cardenas)(CCC#2)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.21 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Cartwright)(EPCC)81341127298
2GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Treuba)(EPTC#2)81331230319
3GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Baeza)(FB)63252042356
4GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Gutierrez)(EPTC#1)63291643368
5GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Olmos)(EPTC#5)54202556418
6GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Garcia)(EPTC#4)45202556408
7GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Abbud)(CCC#1)45222357447
8GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Paralles)(TW#1)27192656409
9GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Allen)(TW#2)18153064429
10GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+W(Cardenas)(CCC#2)1883777502

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adriana Zaragoza
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Elva Malooly
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Cynthia Canales
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.89
Carla Canales
usually #1 Singles 48%, also #2 Singles 24% · published 3
2.82
Celia Al-Tahan
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3
2.66
Anita Boss
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.41
Carmen Cardenas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published 3
Kerry Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Laura Houston
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Lorena Sosa
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Lourdes Olivas
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
usually #3 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Mariaelena Sozer
published
Sandra Alost
published
Shannon Rhoads
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Shelley Danforth
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Stacy Mayo
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lourdes Olivas + Celia Al-Tahan273547% games+5.4% vs expected
Lourdes Olivas + Anita Boss121248% games+2.8% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Celia Al-Tahan21737% games+0.2% vs expected
Celia Al-Tahan + Anita Boss252249% games−2.8% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Lorena Sosa0830% games−15.8% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Shannon Rhoads22633% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Sosa + Stacy Mayo81644% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Danforth + Laura Houston7653% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adriana Zaragoza
44W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Elva Malooly
23W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Cynthia Canales
24W–37L career · 27 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.04
3
Carla Canales
49W–55L career · 21 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Celia Al-Tahan
119W–164L career · 57 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Anita Boss
85W–102L career · 34 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Carmen Cardenas
31W–115L career · type A · 30 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.41
Kerry Gallagher
16W–27L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Houston
49W–20L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorena Sosa
64W–114L career · 40 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lourdes Olivas
98W–118L career · 41 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
18W–67L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariaelena Sozer
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Alost
31W–60L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Rhoads
37W–91L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Danforth
21W–32L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Mayo
47W–97L career · 45 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.