Teams

BP - Spigner

2024 · 2025 SATA USTA MXD 40 & Over - Fall

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · 2025 SATA USTA MXD 40 & Over - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DP - Bristol802318153
2RH - Malinowski/Tippins2671735226
3BP - Spigner2661840261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Brienne Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.93
Sarah Pounders
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.89
Anne Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Tim Burger
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Kris Talsania
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.64
Stephen Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
3.53
Noriel Lipat
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
3.50
Helen Bass
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Brad Self
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Heather Spigner
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3.5
3.16
Carrie Stubbs-Vetrovsky
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Sean Vetrovsky
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Pounders + Anne Brooks6068% games+11.8% vs expected
Tim Burger + Anne Brooks6154% games+8.8% vs expected
Tim Burger + Stephen Stanley10749% games+1.3% vs expected
Sean Vetrovsky + Carrie Stubbs-Vetrovsky1638% gamesnot enough data
Brad Self + Heather Spigner0525% gamesnot enough data
Tim Burger + Helen Bass314 matchesnot enough data
Tim Burger + Noriel Lipat213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brienne Walsh
59W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Sarah Pounders
52W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Anne Brooks
72W–39L career · 34 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
Tim Burger
47W–25L career · 21 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
Kris Talsania
5W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Stephen Stanley
33W–30L career · 16 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Noriel Lipat
14W–33L career · 13 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Helen Bass
8W–25L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Brad Self
21W–46L career · 21 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Heather Spigner
25W–63L career · 25 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Carrie Stubbs-Vetrovsky
3W–17L career · 14 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Sean Vetrovsky
2W–9L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.