Teams

RH - Malinowski/Tippins

2024 · 2025 SATA USTA MXD 40 & Over - Fall

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-20vs DP - BristolLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Malinowski / Tarah Wolf vs Heidi Bristol / Anthony Bensch3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2025 SATA USTA MXD 40 & Over - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DP - Bristol802318153
2RH - Malinowski/Tippins2671735226
3BP - Spigner2661840261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Mary Tippins
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.95
Royston Tedder
usually #1 Doubles 65%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
3.90
Pat Ventura
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.78
Robert Malinowski
usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.77
Janet Caswell
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Bryan Menees
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.70
Emily Jowers
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published 4
3.69
Wes Tedder
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
3.51
Shayn Bausch
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Derwin Roland
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Susie Martin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tarah Wolf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Royston Tedder + Wes Tedder9653% games+7.2% vs expected
Shayn Bausch + Royston Tedder3256% gamesnot enough data
Robert Malinowski + Pat Ventura134 matchesnot enough data
Pat Ventura + Royston Tedder404 matchesnot enough data
Shayn Bausch + Wes Tedder033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Tippins
58W–18L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
Royston Tedder
68W–40L career · 31 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.95
Pat Ventura
47W–21L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Robert Malinowski
65W–49L career · 21 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Janet Caswell
29W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bryan Menees
1W–6L career · type M · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Emily Jowers
45W–20L career · 16 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Wes Tedder
18W–16L career · 13 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.69
Shayn Bausch
19W–47L career · 15 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Derwin Roland
14W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Susie Martin
5W–3L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tarah Wolf
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.