Teams

Aces & Laces

2024 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-08-28Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKit Herndon / Deborah Phelps vs Angela Kris / Sue White4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPhyllis Cox / Sandy Vaughan vs Laura Fletcher / Marilyn Ludt2-6, 1-6
2024-08-19vs Idaho/Ludt?65&Over6.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesSharon Clark / Sue Large vs Laura Fletcher / Charlotte Lewis6-2, 6-3
2024-08-07vs Idaho/Ludt?65&Over6.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesSharon Clark / Sandy Vaughan vs Marilyn Ludt / Beverly McLean6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Ludt?65&Over6.0W5112614114
2Aces & Laces421351199
3Acing Gracefully0621634213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Suzanne Thomas
published 3
3.01
Kit Herndon
published 3
2.90
2.82
Sue Large
published 3
2.81
Kathy Tassano
published 3
Deborah Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Monica Opp
published 3
2.44
Sandy Vaughan
published 3
Phyllis Cox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Vaughan + Phyllis Cox6355% gamesnot enough data
Sue Large + Kathy Tassano4448% gamesnot enough data
Monica Opp + Kathy Tassano3552% gamesnot enough data
Soeurette Chambreau + Suzanne Thomas5267% gamesnot enough data
Soeurette Chambreau + Sue Large3348% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Vaughan + Sue Large224 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Vaughan + Kit Herndon314 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Tassano + Kit Herndon404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Suzanne Thomas
75W–44L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3
Kit Herndon
44W–66L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Soeurette Chambreau
43W–39L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Sue Large
36W–37L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Kathy Tassano
30W–33L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Deborah Phelps
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Monica Opp
11W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Sandy Vaughan
35W–30L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.44
Phyllis Cox
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Clark
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.