Teams

IRCC:Indian Ridge CC:Edelmann/Evans

2021 EMA Adult 18 & Over Women · 2.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-23vs CED:Cedardale Blue:Mintz/MooreLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Guilmartin / Jenny Ezell vs Sharon Stearns / Sarah Tiber2-6, 0-6
2021-07-21vs CED:Cedardale Blue:Mintz/MooreLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Guilmartin / Christina Wiater vs Rachel Mintz / Laura Henry4-6, 4-6
2021-07-15vs CED:Cedardale Green:Mokeler/MooreLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Guilmartin / Becky Washburn vs Kelli Mokeler / Kathleen Harrison1-6, 0-6
2021-06-10vs CED:Cedardale Green:Mokeler/MooreLost 01
L#1 DoublesBecky Washburn / Nicole Guilmartin vs Kelli Mokeler / Kara Ferguson3-6, 1-6
2021-06-03vs SFT:Spark F&T:SidemanLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Rubin / Jenny Ezell vs Valerie Arsenault / Alicia Scarpa4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-05-28vs CED:Cedardale Blue:Mintz/MooreWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Rubin / Nicole Guilmartin vs Chong Treitel / Julie Valenti7-6, 4-2
2021-05-20vs CED:Cedardale Green:Mokeler/MooreSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBecky Washburn / Laura Rubin vs Jennifer Grillo / Amy Young6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNicole Guilmartin vs Megan McCann0-6, 1-6
2021-05-13vs SFT:Spark F&T:SidemanSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLaura Rubin vs Courtney Segee6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChristina Wiater / Nicole Guilmartin vs Valerie Arsenault / Alicia Scarpa1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BRTC:Bass River Red:Graham/Mancuso0781326198
2FCC:Ferncroft CC Green:Cirolo0751633211
3New England/Porath/Adult18&Over2.5W08213691
4SSY:South Shore:Hajjar082139134
5SRF:Scituate Blue:Horne0817719168
6BRTC:Bass River Green:Sweetland/Boehning08121225223
7COH:Cohasset:Higgins/Matheos08101429219
8FCC:Ferncroft CC Blue:Cirolo08111330220
9SSY:Mood SwingsCuesta/Wall08111331242
10IRCC:Indian Ridge CC:Edelmann/Evans0842040263
11BCC:Black Rock:Troyer/O'Brien0812347288
12CED:Cedardale Green:Mokeler/Moore0921613163
13CED:Cedardale Blue:Mintz/Moore0918919172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Tiana Rick
published
2.31
Nicole Guilmartin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Laura Rubin
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Richard Edelmann
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiana Rick
18W–24L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
Nicole Guilmartin
6W–31L career · 7 lines in 2021
92%8%<1%
2.31
Laura Rubin
9W–3L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Richard Edelmann
0W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.