Teams

Bettinger/Kraska 18s 3.5

2022 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-05-16vs Nundkumar 18s 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Clancy / Serena Igharas vs Mary Currie / Libby Ramsey4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-04-25vs Pate 18s 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesSerena Igharas / Debbie Clancy vs Cj Isner / Erin Pate7-5, 7-6
2022-04-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSerena Igharas / Debbie Clancy vs Mickey Draper / Heather Bilderback5-7, 2-6
2022-03-14vs Pate 18s 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSerena Igharas / Sonia Haslam vs Kristen Haynes / Leann Spencer3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Stephanie Bettinger
published
3.71
Lindsay Olin
published
3.53
Teresa Cruz
published
3.49
Andrea Sweat
published 3.5
3.46
Elisabeth Kraska
published 3.5
3.40
April Moss
published 3.5
3.39
Betsy Hooper
published 3.5
3.38
Debbie Clancy
published 3.5
3.32
Serena Igharas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Gladys Dunn
published 3.5
3.26
Niddy Corrias
published
Ginger Hayworth
published 3.5
3.08
Sonia Haslam
published
2.86
Brenda Varner
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Clancy + Teresa Cruz5358% games+7.3% vs expected
Elisabeth Kraska + Stephanie Bettinger4356% games+2.8% vs expected
Debbie Clancy + Niddy Corrias0531% games−4.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Bettinger
26W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Lindsay Olin
19W–14L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Teresa Cruz
28W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Andrea Sweat
26W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Elisabeth Kraska
44W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
April Moss
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Betsy Hooper
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Debbie Clancy
32W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Serena Igharas
149W–124L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Gladys Dunn
29W–22L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Niddy Corrias
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Ginger Hayworth
88W–42L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sonia Haslam
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Brenda Varner
138W–88L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.