Teams

TING.Kuzma

2025 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-24vs TOC.TareenLost 01
L#2 SinglesErin Wynia vs Najia Cheema6-7, 2-6
2025-11-19vs TOC.RiderSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSydney Chick vs Jenny Doyle4-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesCary Armstrong vs Emily Starritt6-1, 6-2
2025-11-18vs TOC.TareenWon 21
W#1 SinglesLynelle Boorey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSydney Chick vs Sarah Franks6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesCary Armstrong vs Najia Cheema5-7, 5-7
2025-11-18vs TOC.RiderSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Jenny Doyle7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesErin Wynia vs Smita Paranjape2-6, 2-6
2025-11-04vs TOC.TareenSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSydney Chick vs Jenna Wood7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLynelle Boorey vs Berna Tareen3-6, 2-6
2025-10-20vs TOC.TareenLost 01
L#1 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Lindsay Castret2-6, 3-6
2025-10-14vs TOC.RiderWon 21
W#1 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Carrie Guthrie6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCary Armstrong vs Meghan Rider6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesErin Wynia vs Emily Starritt4-6, 4-6
2025-09-17vs TOC.RiderWon 21
W#1 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Smita Paranjape6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesLynelle Boorey vs Carrie Guthrie1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Meghan Rider6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Sapna Varkey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
4.05
Lindsay Murdock
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.81
Cary Armstrong
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.80
Jennifer Kuzma
published
3.55
Sydney Chick
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Shannon Littleton
published
3.39
Erin Wynia
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Lynelle Boorey
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sapna Varkey + Lindsay Murdock314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sapna Varkey
81W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Lindsay Murdock
150W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Cary Armstrong
98W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
Jennifer Kuzma
66W–71L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Sydney Chick
50W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
Shannon Littleton
38W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Erin Wynia
185W–127L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Lynelle Boorey
98W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.