Teams

TOC.Rider

2025 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-20vs TOC.TareenWon 20
W#2 SinglesNancy Pack vs Tatiana Nevmyrych6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Berna Tareen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-19vs TING.KuzmaWon 21
W#1 SinglesJenny Doyle vs Sydney Chick6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSmita Paranjape vs Shannon Littleton6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesEmily Starritt vs Cary Armstrong1-6, 2-6
2025-11-18vs TING.KuzmaSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJenny Doyle vs Lindsay Murdock6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSmita Paranjape vs Erin Wynia6-2, 6-2
2025-11-05vs TOC.TareenLost 02
L#1 SinglesJenny Doyle vs Lindsay Castret2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesNancy Pack vs Jenna Wood2-6, 2-6
2025-10-15vs TOC.TareenWon 20
W#1 SinglesJenny Doyle vs Jenna Wood6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSmita Paranjape vs Sarah Franks6-2, 6-1
2025-10-14vs TING.KuzmaSplit 11
L#2 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Cary Armstrong7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesEmily Starritt vs Erin Wynia6-4, 6-4
2025-09-24vs TOC.TareenLost 01
L#1 SinglesSmita Paranjape vs Lindsay Castret3-6, 1-6
2025-09-17vs TING.KuzmaLost 02
L#1 SinglesSmita Paranjape vs Sapna Varkey3-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Lindsay Murdock3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Nancy Pack
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Smita Paranjape
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
3.88
Jenny Doyle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.62
Emily Starritt
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.54
Meghan Rider
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Rider + Emily Starritt8360% games−7.2% vs expected
Nancy Pack + Meghan Rider6260% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Pack + Emily Starritt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nancy Pack
296W–90L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Smita Paranjape
82W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Jenny Doyle
104W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Emily Starritt
205W–104L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Meghan Rider
342W–169L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.