Teams

NJ PINK

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-02vs MC BLUELost 01
L#1 SinglesMaggie Gomer vs Meghan Ciacci1-6, 0-6
2021-05-30vs HIW BRONZELost 03
L#1 DoublesHolly McClure / Katy Thompson vs Mary Tribby / CAROLINE MCQUEEN6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKate Swift vs Wendy Turman7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaggie Gomer / Michelle Brown vs Amy Fletcher / Kristine Stump4-6, 3-6
2021-05-19vs NJ SILVERLost 01
L#1 SinglesMaggie Gomer vs Ingrid Palmer0-6, 2-6
2021-05-12vs RHCC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Brown / Maggie Gomer vs Terri Whitehair / Cheryl Crawford2-6, 0-6
2021-05-01vs HIW BRONZELost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Rivas / Nancy Santmyer vs Mary Tribby / CAROLINE MCQUEEN1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKaty Thompson vs Wendy Turman0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Brown / Kate Swift vs Kristine Stump / Ashley Bacchiarello6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.91 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.01
Katy Thompson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.88
Maggie Gomer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.83
Melissa Sailer
published
Denise Rivas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kate Swift
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Nancy Santmyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Swift + Katy Thompson2443% games+9.2% vs expected
Katy Thompson + Melissa Sailer31036% games−6.5% vs expected
Katy Thompson + Denise Rivas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katy Thompson
27W–44L career · 2 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.01
2.5
Maggie Gomer
51W–118L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Melissa Sailer
12W–41L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
1.83
Denise Rivas
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Kate Swift
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Santmyer
21W–32L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.