Teams

MC BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-02vs NJ PINKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Bent / Erika Schultz vs Holly McClure / Nancy Santmyer2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMeghan Ciacci vs Maggie Gomer6-1, 6-0
2021-05-26vs NJ REDSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKelly Brewster vs Rachel Eng2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Bent / Luann Mcclure vs Tracy Pickett / Cassandra Thompson6-4, 6-2
2021-05-19vs RHCC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Brewster / Erika Schultz vs Beth Trammell / Terri Whitehair6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMeghan Ciacci vs Abbey Wood6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLuann Mcclure / Karen Bent vs Cheryl Crawford / Marcy Garramone3-6, 2-6
2021-05-12vs HIW BRONZEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Brewster / Erika Schultz vs Mary Tribby / Kristine Stump6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMeghan Ciacci vs Wendy Turman4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Bent / Rachel Freer vs Amanda Walker / Julianna Antenucci7-5, 6-0
2021-05-05vs NJ SILVERWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeghan Ciacci / Erika Schultz vs Kristy Matteson / Maile Inagaki4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKelly Brewster vs Deena Green6-2, 6-2
2021-04-28vs NJ PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Bent / Meghan Ciacci vs Kate Swift / Nancy Santmyer6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Brewster / Luann Mcclure vs Melissa Sailer / Denise Rivas6-0, 6-1
2021-04-21vs NJ REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Brewster / Meghan Ciacci vs Jennifer Davis / Kristin Walters6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKaren Bent vs Rachel Eng2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Kelly Brewster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.80
Meghan Ciacci
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.24
Karen Bent
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Erika Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Luann Mcclure
published
Rachel Freer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Bent + Meghan Ciacci3265% gamesnot enough data
Erika Schultz + Luann Mcclure213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kelly Brewster
46W–24L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Meghan Ciacci
72W–55L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
2.5
Karen Bent
47W–86L career · 6 lines in 2021
0%98%2%
2.24
Erika Schultz
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Luann Mcclure
13W–35L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rachel Freer
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.