Teams

NJ RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-02vs RHCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 SinglesKathleen Gerbino vs Marcy Garramone1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Eng / Jennifer Davis vs Melissa Argenti / Lori Komon6-1, 6-0
2021-05-26vs MC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Walters / Kathleen Gerbino vs Erika Schultz / Rachel Freer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-19vs HIW BRONZEWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Young / Kristin Walters vs Amy Fletcher / Mary Tribby0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Davis vs Amanda Walker6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Gerbino / Cassandra Thompson vs Julianna Antenucci / Wendy Turman2-6, 4-6
2021-05-12vs NJ SILVERLost 01
L#1 DoublesRachel Eng / Jennifer Davis vs Deena Green / Karen Kirby4-6, 5-7
2021-05-05vs NJ PINKWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Davis / Rachel Eng vs Nancy Santmyer / Michelle Brown6-1, 6-2
2021-04-28vs RHCC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Walters / Kathleen Gerbino vs Lori Komon / Liz Mercado6-2, 6-0
2021-04-21vs MC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Davis / Kristin Walters vs Kelly Brewster / Meghan Ciacci1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Rachel Eng
published 3.5
3.18
Heather Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Jennifer Davis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.79
Laura Garrido
published 3
2.76
Kristin Walters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Gerbino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.29
Cassandra Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Tracy Pickett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Eng + Laura Garrido5165% games+16.3% vs expected
Rachel Eng + Jennifer Davis7852% games+9.2% vs expected
Heather Young + Kristin Walters11556% games+5.5% vs expected
Laura Garrido + Kristin Walters91049% games+4.0% vs expected
Heather Young + Jennifer Davis7159% games+1.6% vs expected
Heather Young + Laura Garrido7458% games+1.3% vs expected
Laura Garrido + Jennifer Davis5651% games+1.1% vs expected
Kristin Walters + Jennifer Davis6549% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rachel Eng
214W–106L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3
Heather Young
64W–60L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%9%91%
3.18
3
Jennifer Davis
157W–113L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Laura Garrido
99W–72L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
2.79
Kristin Walters
75W–57L career · 1 line in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Kathleen Gerbino
55W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Cassandra Thompson
18W–26L career · 1 line in 2021
0%95%5%
2.29
Tracy Pickett
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.