Teams

UPTA55C/Eleftheriou/Keowee Key

2026 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-26vs UPTA55C/Cousins/KrocWon 21
W#1 DoublesMolly Lease / Sharon Thomas vs Stephanie Trotter Walker / Lauren Demosthenes6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCindy Eleftheriou / Pamela Turner vs Trisha Meadows / Wanda Cummins7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGail Wingard / Wendy Jakszta vs Holly Smith / Ann Ashmore2-6, 1-6
2026-08-19vs UPTA55C/Hendricks/KrocLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Gardiner / Johnna Neri vs Arianna Harley / Nancy Pingitore4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Lease / Sandra Franklin vs Adalis Gutierrez / Heather Gunter3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCindy Eleftheriou / Christine Woerz vs Jill Norman / Francine Holmes2-6, 2-6
2026-08-12vs UPTA55C/Johnson/SpindletreeLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Gardiner / Johnna Neri vs Tarina Mendes / Kim McKinney6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMolly Lease / Christine Woerz vs Karen Johnson / Christy White2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Penoncello / Wendy Jakszta vs Lisa Maly / Adelaide Carpenter2-6, 3-6
2026-08-05vs UPTA55C/Fischer/PavilionLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Penoncello / Dana Loring vs Christina Burnette / Maria Gulli0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGail Wingard / Pamela Turner vs Sandra Hagler / Julie Branham6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Eleftheriou / Patricia Joy vs Carol Rabel / Laura McNeel6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 55+ Combo Women - 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA55C/Johnson/Spindletree3063864
2UPTA55C/Frazier/Riverside2042442
3UPTA55C/Hendricks/Kroc2163871
4UPTA55C/Fischer/Pavilion21541183
5UPTA55C/Cousins/Kroc1133655
6UPTA55C/McGee/GCC02241054
7UPTA55C/Gruendling/Cardinal02151169
8UPTA55C/Eleftheriou/Keowee Key03361393

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Karen Penoncello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Mary Gardiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Cindy Eleftheriou
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Pamela Turner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Molly Lease
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Gail Wingard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Patricia Joy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Dana Loring
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Melissa Coles
published
3.21
Sharon Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Christine Woerz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Johnna Neri
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Wendy Jakszta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Franklin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Turner + Wendy Jakszta4356% games+21.8% vs expected
Sharon Thomas + Wendy Jakszta4457% games+14.8% vs expected
Sharon Thomas + Patricia Joy4156% games+11.6% vs expected
Wendy Jakszta + Dana Loring5453% games+6.2% vs expected
Christine Woerz + Johnna Neri2355% games−1.0% vs expected
Karen Penoncello + Cindy Eleftheriou16558% games−1.6% vs expected
Gail Wingard + Dana Loring2346% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Eleftheriou + Patricia Joy3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Penoncello
25W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Mary Gardiner
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Cindy Eleftheriou
30W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Pamela Turner
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
Molly Lease
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
Gail Wingard
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.40
Patricia Joy
16W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Dana Loring
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Melissa Coles
25W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
Sharon Thomas
33W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.21
3.5
Christine Woerz
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
Johnna Neri
20W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.98
Wendy Jakszta
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
Sandra Franklin
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.