Teams

UPTA55C/Hendricks/Kroc

2026 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-26vs UPTA55C/McGee/GCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAdalis Gutierrez / Heather Gunter vs Liliana McGee / Gay Dupree6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesIna Cottingham / Francine Holmes vs Anna Turrentine / Margaret Boliek6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Norman / Nancy Pingitore vs Veronica Young / Rhonda Jackson6-4, 6-3
2026-08-19vs UPTA55C/Eleftheriou/Keowee KeyWon 21
L#1 DoublesArianna Harley / Nancy Pingitore vs Mary Gardiner / Johnna Neri6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdalis Gutierrez / Heather Gunter vs Molly Lease / Sandra Franklin6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJill Norman / Francine Holmes vs Cindy Eleftheriou / Christine Woerz6-2, 6-2
2026-08-12vs UPTA55C/Cousins/KrocWon 20
W#1 DoublesArianna Harley / Heather Gunter vs Tamarah Hagen / Wanda Cummins1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIna Cottingham / Tricia Socash vs Cameron Keriazakos / Laurie Messenger6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-05vs UPTA55C/Johnson/SpindletreeLost 12
W#1 DoublesDebbie Watson / Kathleen Ryan vs Patti Kortenber / Tarina Mendes6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesArianna Harley / Sarah Hendricks vs Adelaide Carpenter / Lisa Maly3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJill Norman / Kim Tyler vs Karen Johnson / Christy White4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 55+ Combo Women - 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA55C/Johnson/Spindletree3063864
2UPTA55C/Frazier/Riverside2042442
3UPTA55C/Hendricks/Kroc2163871
4UPTA55C/Fischer/Pavilion21541183
5UPTA55C/Cousins/Kroc1133655
6UPTA55C/McGee/GCC02241054
7UPTA55C/Gruendling/Cardinal02151169
8UPTA55C/Eleftheriou/Keowee Key03361393

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Adalis Gutierrez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Jill Norman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Arianna Harley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Tricia Socash
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Kathleen Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Ina Cottingham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Sundee Wright
published
3.21
Kim McFall
published
3.21
Nancy Pingitore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Francine Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Sarah Hendricks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sundee Wright + Adalis Gutierrez6063% games+14.5% vs expected
Sarah Hendricks + Nancy Pingitore4166% games+10.9% vs expected
Francine Holmes + Kathleen Ryan8161% games+10.6% vs expected
Arianna Harley + Sundee Wright7057% games+2.2% vs expected
Sarah Hendricks + Francine Holmes2351% games+1.4% vs expected
Sarah Hendricks + Kathleen Ryan404 matchesnot enough data
Ina Cottingham + Arianna Harley123 matchesnot enough data
Arianna Harley + Nancy Pingitore213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adalis Gutierrez
33W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Jill Norman
24W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.60
4
Arianna Harley
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Tricia Socash
27W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.40
Kathleen Ryan
39W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
Ina Cottingham
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.28
Sundee Wright
30W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Kim McFall
39W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
Nancy Pingitore
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
Francine Holmes
144W–86L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Sarah Hendricks
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.