Teams

Bush

2024 Leon TriLevel 18 & Over · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-12vs StrattonWon 10
W#3 DoublesBecky Bush / Jennifer Winegardner vs Juliana Schneider / Julie Espy6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-09-21vs HerringWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Winegardner / Olivia McCaffery vs Gina Herring / Tracy Propp6-1, 6-1
2024-08-03vs StrattonWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Jones / Jennifer Britt vs Kim Thriffiley / Susan Goodwin6-3, 7-5
2024-06-22vs BartensSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJennifer Winegardner / Elizabeth Murray vs Mariela Bartens / Susan Ragsdale6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Franson / Jennifer Britt vs Pia Lehtonen / Cathy Kendall3-6, 4-6
2024-06-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Britt / Anna Jones vs Cathy Kendall / Jessica Bahorski6-1, 6-2
2024-05-11vs StrattonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Warner / Jennifer Britt vs Rhonda Tullos / Susan Goodwin6-3, 6-4
2024-04-27vs BartensLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Winegardner / Olivia McCaffery vs Brenda Jahn / Kathy Maus2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Elizabeth Murray
published
3.72
Jennifer Britt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Lisa Franson
published
3.52
Jennifer Winegardner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Olivia McCaffery
published
3.33
Nancy Donahue
published
3.33
Anna Jones
published 4
3.29
Becky Bush
published 3.5
3.22
Rosina Cherry
published
3.15
Susan Ault
published
3.13
Deborah Beers
published 3.5
Kimberly Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Winegardner + Becky Bush6253% games+4.7% vs expected
Lisa Franson + Elizabeth Murray033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Murray
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Jennifer Britt
111W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Lisa Franson
18W–17L career · no lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Jennifer Winegardner
195W–211L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Olivia McCaffery
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
Nancy Donahue
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
4
Anna Jones
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Becky Bush
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Rosina Cherry
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Susan Ault
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Deborah Beers
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Kimberly Miller
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.