Teams

Stratton

2024 Leon TriLevel 18 & Over · 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJuliana Schneider / Julie Espy vs Becky Bush / Jennifer Winegardner4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-10-05Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAskal Ali / Juliana Schneider vs Brenda Jahn / Junko Stout2-6, 5-7
2024-09-14vs BushLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaria Stratton / Askal Ali vs Deborah Beers / Elizabeth Murray2-6, 5-7
2024-08-24vs BushLost 01
L#3 DoublesSherry Cady / Maria Stratton vs Elizabeth Murray / Nancy Donahue3-6, 0-6
2024-08-17vs HerringLost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Espy / Sherry Cady vs Tracy Propp / Tricia Szwarc3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Tiffany Jones
published
3.82
Catherine Reid
published 4
3.67
Askal Ali
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Kim Thriffiley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.42
Sherry Cady
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Susan Goodwin
published
3.35
Joan Bassett
published
3.33
Julie Espy
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.17
Beth Vecchioli
published 3.5
3.03
Maria Stratton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Juliana Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juliana Schneider + Julie Espy3545% games+4.6% vs expected
Juliana Schneider + Maria Stratton0728% gamesnot enough data
Julie Espy + Sherry Cady3347% gamesnot enough data
Kim Thriffiley + Sherry Cady224 matchesnot enough data
Askal Ali + Julie Espy314 matchesnot enough data
Askal Ali + Maria Stratton134 matchesnot enough data
Sherry Cady + Maria Stratton134 matchesnot enough data
Julie Espy + Maria Stratton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Jones
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Catherine Reid
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Askal Ali
106W–62L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Kim Thriffiley
144W–202L career · 5 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Sherry Cady
196W–173L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
Susan Goodwin
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
Joan Bassett
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Julie Espy
146W–128L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Beth Vecchioli
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Maria Stratton
9W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Juliana Schneider
46W–84L career · 2 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.