Teams

SFV - Nikki's Tennis Crew/N Robbins

2025 Team Singles 18 SFV Summer · SFV 18+ Women 3.0 Singles

8 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-07vs SFV - Spin Offs 3.0W Singles/BennettSplit 11
W#1 SinglesPhuong Vance vs Christine Doryon6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesWHITNEY Bliss vs Jennifer Wexler4-4
2025-09-06vs SFV - Shot Girls/AlcantarWon 20
W#1 SinglesNazli Alimi vs Alexis Alcantar6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJoann Buckley Collins vs Nereida Carrillo6-0, 6-0
2025-08-30vs SFV - PPB Singles/ChuLost 12
W#1 SinglesDesire Stephens vs Gabrielle Shrier7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJoann Buckley Collins vs Cindy Larson4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesGanga Chandramohan vs Hillary Williams2-6, 5-7
2025-08-23vs SFV - El Cab Saturday/S TalmadgeWon 21
W#1 SinglesNazli Alimi vs Shelby Church6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesWHITNEY Bliss vs Rackel Savadian6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJoann Buckley Collins vs Bryanna Comilang7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNazli Alimi vs Anna Bowen6-2, 7-6
L#2 SinglesGanga Chandramohan vs Elizabeth Payne2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesDesire Stephens vs Melissa Turai6-1, 6-0
2025-07-27vs SFV - LLW Ace Queens/J OrtizLost 02
L#1 SinglesGrace Gillham vs Cathy Hsu3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJoann Buckley Collins vs Judith Ortiz6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ Women 3.0 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Desire Stephens
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.72
Nazli Alimi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.72
Phuong Vance
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.51
Cindy Emanuel
published 3
2.44
Grace Gillham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.39
Ganga Chandramohan
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Joann Buckley Collins
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
WHITNEY Bliss
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Desire Stephens
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.17
Nazli Alimi
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
Phuong Vance
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Cindy Emanuel
17W–29L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Grace Gillham
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%68%32%
2.44
3
Ganga Chandramohan
2W–12L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.39
Joann Buckley Collins
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
WHITNEY Bliss
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.