Teams

SFV - PPB Singles/Chu

2025 Team Singles 18 SFV Summer · SFV 18+ Women 3.0 Singles

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 SinglesLourdes Duarte vs Anna Bowen6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesGabrielle Shrier vs Melissa Turai6-0, 6-1
2025-09-07vs SFV - El Cab Sunday/S TalmadgeWon 30
W#1 SinglesLourdes Duarte vs Carolina Ciappa6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesWendy Correa vs Penny Zhang6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesChristine Chu vs Aubrey Farkas Harris6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesGabrielle Shrier vs Desire Stephens6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCindy Larson vs Joann Buckley Collins6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesHillary Williams vs Ganga Chandramohan6-2, 7-5
2025-08-24vs SFV - LLW Ace Queens/J OrtizSplit 11
L#2 SinglesGabrielle Shrier vs Cathy Hsu4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesCindy Larson vs Judith Ortiz1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-02vs SFV - Shot Girls/AlcantarSplit 11
L#2 SinglesHillary Williams vs Diana Guevara6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCindy Larson vs Nereida Carrillo6-0, 6-1
2025-07-19vs SFV - El Cab Saturday/S TalmadgeWon 20
W#2 SinglesLourdes Duarte vs Bryanna Comilang6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesWendy Correa vs Rackel Savadian6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ Women 3.0 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Gabrielle Shrier
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Wendy Correa
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.89
Cindy Larson
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.86
Lourdes Duarte
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.84
Hillary Williams
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.83
Christine Chu
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Sara Herta
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gabrielle Shrier
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Wendy Correa
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Cindy Larson
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lourdes Duarte
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Hillary Williams
8W–9L career · type M · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Christine Chu
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Sara Herta
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.