Teams

Burnstein/Nashville

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

18 players · average NTRP 3.70 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-25vs Rutherford/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesLacey Keally / Morgan Hinkley vs Nita Hollis / Laura Murak6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesWhitney Conyers vs Barb Morris6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Burnstein / Angie Wesley vs Cheryl Byrd / Marsha Simoneaux6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDodson Randolph / Kristin Dennis vs Janet Barber / Kimberly Jones6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesMisty Holladay / Annie Adler vs Lindsey Murrell / Emily Walker6-0, 6-1
2025-04-07vs Hirst/Martin/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKates Snyder / Misty Holladay vs Scotty Falk / Cindy Knapp3-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesJulie Burnstein / Ashley Stringfellow vs Katherine Goodson / Laura Wilson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-21vs Rutherford/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesBriana Mullenax / Whitney Conyers vs Nita Hollis / Marsha Simoneaux6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesPoonam Kabaria vs Larissa Stansell6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDodson Randolph / Kristin Dennis vs Janet Barber / Kimberly Jones4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMorgan Hinkley / Lacey Keally vs Susan Welch / Barb Morris6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesJulie Burnstein / Annie Adler vs Beth Molteni / Angie Howard6-1, 6-0
2025-03-17vs Powers/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Burnstein / Whitney Conyers vs Heather Large / Anjali Lewis7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMisty Holladay / Briana Mullenax vs Julie Dearman / Ashley Snipes6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Chantelle Duncan
published 4
3.73
Briana Mullenax
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Julie Burnstein
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Janny McClure
published
3.55
Lacey Keally
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Lisa Yawn
published
3.53
Whitney Conyers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.51
Kristin Dennis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Misty Holladay
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Poonam Kabaria
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.39
Annie Adler
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Morgan Hinkley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Maryam Khan
published
3.28
Dodson Randolph
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Ali Davis
published 3.5
3.25
Angie Wesley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Virginia Mazzoni
published
Katherine Cigarran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Briana Mullenax + Janny McClure5065% games+15.4% vs expected
Briana Mullenax + Whitney Conyers11362% games+14.6% vs expected
Lacey Keally + Morgan Hinkley5753% games+11.6% vs expected
Maryam Khan + Poonam Kabaria6261% games+4.0% vs expected
Julie Burnstein + Whitney Conyers5453% games+1.9% vs expected
Dodson Randolph + Kristin Dennis4845% games+0.1% vs expected
Julie Burnstein + Briana Mullenax3453% games−2.5% vs expected
Julie Burnstein + Morgan Hinkley0541% games−3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chantelle Duncan
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Briana Mullenax
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Julie Burnstein
33W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Janny McClure
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Lacey Keally
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Lisa Yawn
20W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Whitney Conyers
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Kristin Dennis
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Misty Holladay
18W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Poonam Kabaria
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Annie Adler
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Morgan Hinkley
20W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Maryam Khan
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Dodson Randolph
34W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Ali Davis
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Angie Wesley
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Virginia Mazzoni
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Katherine Cigarran
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.