Teams

Phillippi/Laterrade-18/3.5/M/Pelican

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.83 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesSeth Monaghan / Michael Lane vs Jarrod Sullivan / Jason Landry6-0, 6-1
2025-04-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Torres Potes / Steven Burgess vs Travis Motichek / JP Love6-0, 6-0
2025-04-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlejandro Torres Potes / Seth Monaghan vs Brandon Beyl / Ty McGuire7-6, 6-3
2025-04-09vs Looper-18/3.5/M/PelicanWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatt Dean / Jack Ellis vs Justin Guitreau / Sid Hauptmann4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSeth Monaghan / David Butler vs Devin Smith / Mark Mills6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSteven Burgess / Alejandro Torres Potes vs Scott Cuevas / Daniel Enk4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-05Won 10
W#2 SinglesPaul Kalman vs Cristian Topescu6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-02vs Griffin-18/3.5/M/N.CypressWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Kalman / John Hearn vs Trey Caswell / Tyler Crochet6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKeith West / Matt Dean vs Todd Bode Jr. / Taylor Parker6-4, 6-3
2025-03-26Won 20
W#1 DoublesKeith West / Matt Dean vs Jeffrey Barach / Stephen Short4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteven Burgess / Alejandro Torres Potes vs Brandon Beyl / Ryan Nash6-2, 6-4
2025-03-19vs Looper-18/3.5/M/PelicanWon 30
W#1 SinglesPaul Kalman vs Ken Looper6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Butler / Matt Dean vs Sid Hauptmann / Daniel Enk6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSeth Monaghan / Shawn Potter vs Shaoming Lu / Jonathan Magee6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Maxwell Agnew
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published
3.73
Keith West
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.67
Michael Lane
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.58
David Butler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.54
Daniel Butler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Alejandro Torres Potes
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.44
John Hearn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Garrett Phillippi
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Jack Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Keith Krebs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Keith Laterrade
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Matt Dean
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Kalman
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Ryan Fournier
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Seth Monaghan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Shawn Potter
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Steven Burgess
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Laterrade + Michael Lane4256% gamesnot enough data
Jack Ellis + Maxwell Agnew5073% gamesnot enough data
Jack Ellis + Michael Lane5065% gamesnot enough data
Keith West + Michael Lane4166% gamesnot enough data
John Hearn + Michael Lane314 matchesnot enough data
Matt Dean + Alejandro Torres Potes404 matchesnot enough data
Steven Burgess + Alejandro Torres Potes404 matchesnot enough data
David Butler + Daniel Butler404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maxwell Agnew
18W–2L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
Keith West
24W–9L career · 17 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Michael Lane
34W–8L career · 15 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
David Butler
6W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Daniel Butler
6W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Alejandro Torres Potes
14W–3L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
John Hearn
12W–4L career · 10 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Garrett Phillippi
8W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jack Ellis
19W–3L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keith Krebs
10W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keith Laterrade
14W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Dean
11W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Kalman
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Fournier
22W–5L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Seth Monaghan
7W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Potter
11W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Burgess
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.