Teams

HU - Wiles

2025 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2024- HSV · 4.5 WOMEN 40N3D

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-18vs Casillas Fall 4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesCindy Morgan / Leslie Pensa vs Lisa Martin / Amanda Wheaton6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAshley Fiore / Janet Meko vs Audra Hill / Amy Thomas6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Wood / Ginny Pylant vs Melanie Casillas / Stephanie Steele6-1, 6-1
2024-11-17vs Casillas Fall 4.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Shulman / Karen Strickland vs Amanda Wheaton / Derinda Gainer6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAshley Fiore / Jennifer Wood vs Stephanie Steele / Kimberly Chandler4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Kowalski / Shelley Porter vs Melanie Casillas / Audra Hill6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-11-12vs Casillas Fall 4.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesStaci Young / Ashley Fiore vs Kimberly Chandler / Stephanie Steele6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Wood / Ginny Pylant vs Melanie Casillas / Lisa Martin6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCindy Morgan / Mary Swinney vs Amy Thomas / Gina VanLeeuwen6-2, 6-2
2024-10-16vs Casillas Fall 4.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Strickland / Leslie Pensa vs Stephanie Steele / Kimberly Chandler6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Morgan / Shelley Porter vs Jody Toms / Michele Tate6-0, 6-2
2024-10-07vs Casillas Fall 4.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Morgan / Shelley Porter vs Melanie Casillas / Lisa Martin7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Powell / Jennifer Wood vs Jody Toms / Derinda Gainer6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMorgan Coulter / Ginny Pylant vs Kimberly Chandler / Stephanie Steele1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 WOMEN 40N3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Cindy Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.39
Ginny Pylant
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.32
Ashley Fiore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Janet Meko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Sandra Wiles
published
4.05
Morgan Coulter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Karen Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Staci Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Leslie Pensa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Mary Swinney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Shelley Porter
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.92
Linda Powell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kelly Kowalski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Morgan + Linda Powell7073% games+10.9% vs expected
Cindy Morgan + Shelley Porter12363% games+5.2% vs expected
Ginny Pylant + Morgan Coulter10462% games+3.5% vs expected
Janet Meko + Ashley Fiore4168% games+1.1% vs expected
Leslie Pensa + Staci Young224 matchesnot enough data
Staci Young + Mary Swinney033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cindy Morgan
39W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
4.40
Ginny Pylant
26W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Ashley Fiore
23W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Janet Meko
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
Sandra Wiles
14W–24L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Morgan Coulter
55W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%37%63%
4.05
Karen Strickland
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.04
Staci Young
10W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Leslie Pensa
18W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Mary Swinney
44W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
Shelley Porter
15W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.92
Linda Powell
66W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Kelly Kowalski
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.