Teams

Casillas Fall 4.5

2025 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2024- HSV · 4.5 WOMEN 40N3D

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-11-20vs Palmer 40+ 4.5 FallWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Audra Hill vs Kristy Haraway / Lensey Smith4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDerinda Gainer / Gina VanLeeuwen vs TAMMY HALL / Nermein Lotfy0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Steele / Lisa Martin vs Karen Lee / Marla Wood6-0, 6-1
2024-11-18vs HU - WilesLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Martin / Amanda Wheaton vs Cindy Morgan / Leslie Pensa1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAudra Hill / Amy Thomas vs Ashley Fiore / Janet Meko1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Stephanie Steele vs Jennifer Wood / Ginny Pylant1-6, 1-6
2024-11-17vs HU - WilesWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmanda Wheaton / Derinda Gainer vs Lisa Shulman / Karen Strickland1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Steele / Kimberly Chandler vs Ashley Fiore / Jennifer Wood6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Audra Hill vs Kelly Kowalski / Shelley Porter4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-11-14vs Palmer 40+ 4.5 FallSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Stephanie Steele vs Kristy Palmer / Karen Lee6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDerinda Gainer / Lisa Martin vs TAMMY HALL / Cheryl Saunders2-6, 4-6
2024-11-12vs HU - WilesLost 12
W#1 DoublesKimberly Chandler / Stephanie Steele vs Staci Young / Ashley Fiore6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Lisa Martin vs Jennifer Wood / Ginny Pylant1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Thomas / Gina VanLeeuwen vs Cindy Morgan / Mary Swinney2-6, 2-6
2024-10-29vs Palmer 40+ 4.5 FallWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Steele / Kimberly Chandler vs Rachel Carpenter / Lensey Smith6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Amy Thomas vs Kristy Palmer / Nermein Lotfy1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGina VanLeeuwen / Derinda Gainer vs Marla Wood / Karen Lee6-3, 7-6
2024-10-20vs Palmer 40+ 4.5 FallLost 03
L#1 DoublesJody Toms / Amanda Wheaton vs Nermein Lotfy / Lauren Plott6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDerinda Gainer / Audra Hill vs Rachel Carpenter / Melanie Williams1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Martin / Michele Tate vs Kristy Haraway / Lensey Smith5-7, 2-6
2024-10-16vs HU - WilesWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Steele / Kimberly Chandler vs Karen Strickland / Leslie Pensa7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Audra Hill vs Jennifer Wood / Anna Weber6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJody Toms / Michele Tate vs Cindy Morgan / Shelley Porter0-6, 2-6
2024-10-07vs HU - WilesLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Lisa Martin vs Cindy Morgan / Shelley Porter6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJody Toms / Derinda Gainer vs Linda Powell / Jennifer Wood4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Chandler / Stephanie Steele vs Morgan Coulter / Ginny Pylant6-1, 6-1
2024-10-05vs Palmer 40+ 4.5 FallWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Lisa Martin vs Louise Carter / Karen Lee2-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Steele / Audra Hill vs Kristy Palmer / Lauren Plott6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Wheaton / Jody Toms vs Melanie Williams / Cheryl Saunders5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 WOMEN 40N3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Melanie Casillas
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Stephanie Steele
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Audra Hill
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Derinda Gainer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.56
Amanda Wheaton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.52
Gina VanLeeuwen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Jody Toms
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Michele Tate
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Steele + Kimberly Chandler8158% games+7.8% vs expected
Stephanie Steele + Melanie Casillas8459% games+2.3% vs expected
Stephanie Steele + Derinda Gainer404 matchesnot enough data
Jody Toms + Derinda Gainer314 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Casillas + Audra Hill404 matchesnot enough data
Jody Toms + Amanda Wheaton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Casillas
42W–37L career · 9 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
Stephanie Steele
133W–37L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Audra Hill
13W–3L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Derinda Gainer
101W–44L career · 10 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Amanda Wheaton
21W–26L career · 8 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Gina VanLeeuwen
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Jody Toms
21W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Michele Tate
14W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Kimberly Chandler
10W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.