Teams

SSHP YELLOW

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs BCST REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesTraci Henry / Esther Ortwein vs Clara Mizenko / Judith Wallach6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesToni Lapp vs Sarah Smith6-0, 5-0
L#2 DoublesMaureen Mallon / Candace Sotwick vs Melissa Zantop / Janis Owens1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Nancy Hogue vs Maryann Barwick / Mary Mucilli2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-12vs LEBTC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesNadia Tippett / Maureen Mallon vs Sarah Nelson / Kelly Crawley3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesToni Lapp vs Farrah Johnson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEsther Ortwein / Maria Blakney vs Susan Kim / Tamiko Norris6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Hogue / Nancy Railey-Borchelt vs Meghan Page / Mary Bakken1-6, 4-6
2022-07-07vs KC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesMaureen Mallon / Nadia Tippett vs Jennifer Manta / Lori Goulding7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTraci Henry vs Gina Akins6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesToni Lapp / Nancy Hogue vs Marlene Samokishyn / Janet McMahon6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCandace Sotwick / Esther Ortwein vs Danette Henderson / Maria Fischer2-6, 3-6
2022-06-28vs BM BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesMaria Blakney / Toni Lapp vs Debbie Krenz / Amy Geist1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTraci Henry vs Jennifer Moxon6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNadia Tippett / Maureen Mallon vs Diana Collins / Dawn Cominsky6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCandace Sotwick / Nancy Hogue vs Ashley Miller / Ari Nicholson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-21vs LTFC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesMaria Blakney / Esther Ortwein vs Victoria Burgess / Emily Main Ballard4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTraci Henry vs Robyn Moore3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Toni Lapp vs Tiffany Cholez / Kathy Hoskins4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesNancy Hogue / Nadia Tippett vs Tamara Brown / Sarah Hughes1-6, 1-6
2022-06-14vs KC SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Hogue / Nancy Railey-Borchelt vs Lynn Adams / Corinne Kesner0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTraci Henry / Toni Lapp vs Erin Stampa / Jill M Shields6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMaureen Mallon / Esther Ortwein vs Nelisha Firestone / Jacqueline Hancock3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-07vs GR NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Maria Blakney vs Jacki Malone / Kimberly Fekete4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesToni Lapp vs Kelly Meilstrup1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen Mallon / Nadia Tippett vs Heather Killeen / Sabrina Pellerin6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTraci Henry / Esther Ortwein vs Celia Finnegan / Tracey Felicidade Jones6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Maria Blakney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Traci Henry
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.53
Nancy Railey-Borchelt
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.47
Nancy Hogue
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Candace Sotwick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Esther Ortwein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Maureen Mallon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nadia Tippett
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Toni Lapp
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Hogue + Toni Lapp4550% games+6.7% vs expected
Maureen Mallon + Nadia Tippett4450% games+4.5% vs expected
Nancy Railey-Borchelt + Traci Henry2454% games+2.1% vs expected
Nancy Hogue + Nancy Railey-Borchelt51244% games−0.7% vs expected
Nancy Railey-Borchelt + Toni Lapp2645% games−1.0% vs expected
Nancy Hogue + Traci Henry5250% games−4.2% vs expected
Nancy Hogue + Candace Sotwick134 matchesnot enough data
Toni Lapp + Traci Henry224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Maria Blakney
30W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
Traci Henry
33W–34L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Nancy Railey-Borchelt
45W–72L career · 5 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
2.53
Nancy Hogue
35W–50L career · 6 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.47
2.5
Candace Sotwick
9W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Esther Ortwein
2W–9L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Mallon
9W–18L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nadia Tippett
12W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Toni Lapp
18W–35L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.