Teams

LTFC GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs BM BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesTiffany Cholez / Emily Main Ballard vs Ashley Miller / Debbie Krenz4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRobyn Moore vs Jennifer Moxon7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelly Kliner / Kathy Hoskins vs Dawn Cominsky / Millie Knox6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTammy Holder / Sarah Hughes vs Jodie Thompson / Jane Carlson6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-07-12vs BCST REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesVictoria Burgess / Robyn Moore vs Clara Mizenko / Kimberly Lange6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTiffany Cholez vs Sarah Smith6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTammy Holder / Erin Broerman vs Michelle Harvey / Judith Wallach6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Hoskins / Sarah Hughes vs Patti Blanchard / Sharon Ehler6-0, 6-2
2022-07-05vs KC SILVERWon 31
L#1 DoublesTiffany Cholez / Victoria Burgess vs Corinne Kesner / Kelly Fisher6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRobyn Moore vs Crystal Adams7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErin Broerman / Kathy Hoskins vs Jill M Shields / Lisa Luong7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTammy Holder / Sarah Hughes vs Erin Stampa / Courtney Baraglia6-4, 6-2
2022-06-28vs GR NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEmily Main Ballard / Victoria Burgess vs Tracey Felicidade Jones / Jacki Malone6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRobyn Moore vs Kelly Meilstrup3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Holder / Erin Broerman vs Heather Killeen / Katie Bostwick4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTamara Brown / Kelly Kliner vs Celia Finnegan / Lori Strike7-5, 6-1
2022-06-21vs SSHP YELLOWWon 40
W#1 DoublesVictoria Burgess / Emily Main Ballard vs Maria Blakney / Esther Ortwein6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRobyn Moore vs Traci Henry6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTiffany Cholez / Kathy Hoskins vs Nancy Railey-Borchelt / Toni Lapp6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTamara Brown / Sarah Hughes vs Nancy Hogue / Nadia Tippett6-1, 6-1
2022-06-14vs LEBTC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTamara Brown / Kelly Kliner vs Tanya Koch / Meghan Page1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTiffany Cholez vs Farrah Johnson6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErin Broerman / Kathy Hoskins vs Mary Bakken / Stephanie Price4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCynthia Demas / Corrinthia Fauconier vs Soyon Bueno / Tamiko Norris3-6, 3-6
2022-06-07vs KC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEmily Main Ballard / Kathy Hoskins vs Lori Goulding / Janie Ramseier1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTiffany Cholez vs Gina Akins7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSarah Hughes / Erin Broerman vs Danette Henderson / Lisa McNeal5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCynthia Demas / Corrinthia Fauconier vs Jennifer Manta / Deven Farris2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Victoria Burgess
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Robyn Moore
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.16
Emily Main Ballard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Sarah Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.98
Tiffany Cholez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Kathy Hoskins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Erin Broerman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Tammy Holder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.30
Tamara Brown
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Cynthia Demas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Corrinthia Fauconier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Kliner
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Cholez + Emily Main Ballard17660% games+8.4% vs expected
Erin Broerman + Tammy Holder5450% games+4.9% vs expected
Tamara Brown + Kelly Kliner2344% games−2.4% vs expected
Erin Broerman + Kathy Hoskins314 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Hughes + Tamara Brown314 matchesnot enough data
Robyn Moore + Emily Main Ballard224 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Hughes + Kelly Kliner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Burgess
39W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
Robyn Moore
58W–42L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Emily Main Ballard
66W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Sarah Hughes
70W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.00
Tiffany Cholez
41W–23L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
2.98
Kathy Hoskins
44W–41L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Erin Broerman
48W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Tammy Holder
86W–78L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
Tamara Brown
22W–31L career · 3 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.30
2.5
Cynthia Demas
1W–3L career · type T · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Corrinthia Fauconier
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Kliner
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.