Teams

Love Triangle

2023 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Angie Stromquist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Gabriela McIntosh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2023-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Cate Harrington vs Morgan Cowling / Carly Vendegna6-3, 6-4
2023-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Gabriela McIntosh vs Lyudmila Leissler / Lia Irvin7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Gabriela McIntosh vs Susan McMullin / Tammy LaFrazia7-5, 6-2
2023-07-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesCate Harrington / Gabriela McIntosh vs Maya Mori / Parish Burns6-3, 6-0
2023-07-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Cate Harrington vs Reiko Maeda / Michelle Johnson4-4
2023-06-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Cate Harrington vs Jenny Marston / Wendy Schmidt6-1, 6-0
2023-06-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Cate Harrington vs Sarah Mutal / Garrene Mcgale6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesCate Harrington / Gabriela McIntosh vs Tanya Wong / Kathy Ramsey6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Angie Stromquist
92W–47L career
1%98%0%
3.75
4
Gabriela McIntosh
111W–90L career
18%82%0%
3.56

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.