Teams

Cheval Cheetahs - Busby/Revelia

2025 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.67 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesKatie Dietz / Elizabeth Heitner vs Blakely Kriegshauser / Susanna Bray4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHanna Fang vs Lindsey Bradbury6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKrystal Adrian / Dawn Kay vs Lauren Companioni / Caro Massari1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJoanne Hurley / Chrissy Lambert vs Kimberly Smith / Siwon Jang4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMeredith Busby / Chrissy Lambert vs Elizabeth Hanlon / Rachel Sultenfuss6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMisty Revelia vs Sonia Isacchi6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKrystal Adrian / Elizabeth Heitner vs Melissa Speidel / Oumaima Kaab1-6, 3-6
2024-10-25vs Hills/Lannon/18&Over2.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMeredith Busby / Chrissy Lambert vs Katy Lannon / Maggie Packer6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMisty Revelia vs Sara Edge0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Ingham / Katie Dietz vs Molly James / Caroline Doyle3-6, 2-6
2024-09-13vs RH Make it a Double - L. PascoliLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeredith Busby / Joanne Hurley vs Haney Song / Ann Dunleavy0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Elizabeth Heitner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Hanna Fang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.51
Chrissy Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Katie Dietz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Joanne Hurley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.32
Misty Revelia
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Barbara Ingham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Dawn Kay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.06
Krystal Adrian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.83
Linda Weber
published
Meredith Busby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Heitner
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.91
Hanna Fang
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Chrissy Lambert
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Katie Dietz
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Joanne Hurley
58W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Misty Revelia
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.32
2.5
Barbara Ingham
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Dawn Kay
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Krystal Adrian
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Linda Weber
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.83
Meredith Busby
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.