Teams

Valdosta/Tina Folsom

2026 Valdosta USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-03vs Schruijer-Tennis ValdostaWon 40
W#1 DoublesBrooke Moreno / Tori Holmes vs Gretchen Fricks / Melanie Ellis6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnne Rickert vs Andrea Schruijer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTina Folsom / Dana Boruff vs Cindy Robinson / Michelle Kirkpatrick6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGwenn Haden / Stephanie Blevins vs Tara Purvis / Meghan Womack6-2, 6-2
2026-04-26vs Schruijer-Tennis ValdostaWon 30
W#1 DoublesTori Holmes / Brooke Moreno vs Melanie Ellis / Gretchen Fricks6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDana Boruff / Becky Smith vs Michelle Kirkpatrick / Cindy Robinson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Soshnik / Sarah Kolisz vs Julee Lincoln / Leigh Ann Hogan6-4, 6-2
2026-04-19vs Schruijer-Tennis ValdostaWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnne Rickert / Becky Smith vs Tara Purvis / Meghan Womack6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTina Folsom vs Andrea Schruijer6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Soshnik / Sarah Kolisz vs Julee Lincoln / Leigh Ann Hogan6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGwenn Haden / Stephanie Blevins vs Cindy Robinson / Melanie Ellis1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Valdosta/Tina Folsom30111260
2Schruijer-Tennis Valdosta0311122135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Dana Boruff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Tina Folsom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.37
Sarah Kolisz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Gwenn Haden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Anne Rickert
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Brooke Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Sarah Soshnik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tori Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Moreno + Tori Holmes4158% games+7.3% vs expected
Dana Boruff + Tina Folsom303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Boruff
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Tina Folsom
12W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Sarah Kolisz
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Gwenn Haden
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Anne Rickert
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Brooke Moreno
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Soshnik
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Tori Holmes
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.