Teams

Schruijer-Tennis Valdosta

2026 Valdosta USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-03vs Valdosta/Tina FolsomLost 04
L#1 DoublesGretchen Fricks / Melanie Ellis vs Brooke Moreno / Tori Holmes3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Schruijer vs Anne Rickert1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Robinson / Michelle Kirkpatrick vs Tina Folsom / Dana Boruff4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTara Purvis / Meghan Womack vs Gwenn Haden / Stephanie Blevins2-6, 2-6
2026-04-26vs Valdosta/Tina FolsomLost 04
L#1 DoublesMelanie Ellis / Gretchen Fricks vs Tori Holmes / Brooke Moreno4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Schruijer vs Stephanie Blevins2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Kirkpatrick / Cindy Robinson vs Dana Boruff / Becky Smith0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulee Lincoln / Leigh Ann Hogan vs Sarah Soshnik / Sarah Kolisz4-6, 2-6
2026-04-19vs Valdosta/Tina FolsomLost 13
L#1 DoublesTara Purvis / Meghan Womack vs Anne Rickert / Becky Smith2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Schruijer vs Tina Folsom2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulee Lincoln / Leigh Ann Hogan vs Sarah Soshnik / Sarah Kolisz2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Robinson / Melanie Ellis vs Gwenn Haden / Stephanie Blevins6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Valdosta/Tina Folsom30111260
2Schruijer-Tennis Valdosta0311122135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Gretchen Fricks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Julee Lincoln
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Melanie Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Meghan Womack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Leigh Ann Hogan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Tara Purvis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Andrea Schruijer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Michelle Kirkpatrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Womack + Tara Purvis044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gretchen Fricks
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Julee Lincoln
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Melanie Ellis
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Meghan Womack
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Leigh Ann Hogan
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01
Tara Purvis
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Andrea Schruijer
2W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Michelle Kirkpatrick
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.